YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Sensitivity Analysis of Phase Change Modeling for Non-Ideal Fluids in Turbomachinery Applications

    Source: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:007
    Author:
    Tegethoff, Katharina
    ,
    Schuster, Sebastian
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4070564
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Abstract. Investigating phase change phenomena with numerical methods reveals a strong dependence on the selected model equations. The phase change from gas to liquid, or condensation, is primarily governed by nucleation and droplet growth. Numerous model equations for both processes exist in the literature, typically based on the law of ideal gases and empirical factors historically fitted for water. Despite this fluid-specific calibration, results show significant model sensitivity even for water. This effect increases for other fluids, such as CO2, which exhibit strong nonideal thermophysical properties. To enable reliable modeling for such fluids, it is essential to first identify which model parameters exert dominant influence. This study contributes by systematically varying model approaches and parameters. For both water and CO2, a test case of supersonic flow through a Laval nozzle is considered. The sensitivity study examines variations in the calculation of the critical energy barrier for nucleation, droplet growth rate, and type of modeling the droplet size distribution. A comparison of two fundamentally different numerical schemes further distinguishes the influence of physical modeling from that of numerical variability. Results for CO2 show a sensitivity to droplet size distribution modeling comparable to water, but with a broader spread for phase change modeling due to fluid nonidealities. These findings support a systematic uncertainty estimate for phase change modeling in turbomachinery operated with CO2 and point to the need for experimental validation of condensation models in nonideal fluids.
    • Download: (2.076Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Sensitivity Analysis of Phase Change Modeling for Non-Ideal Fluids in Turbomachinery Applications

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4314918
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power

    Show full item record

    contributor authorTegethoff, Katharina
    contributor authorSchuster, Sebastian
    date accessioned2026-08-23T07:18:36Z
    date available2026-08-23T07:18:36Z
    date copyright2026/07/01
    date issued2026
    identifier issn0742-4795
    identifier othergtp-25-1408.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4314918
    description abstractAbstract. Investigating phase change phenomena with numerical methods reveals a strong dependence on the selected model equations. The phase change from gas to liquid, or condensation, is primarily governed by nucleation and droplet growth. Numerous model equations for both processes exist in the literature, typically based on the law of ideal gases and empirical factors historically fitted for water. Despite this fluid-specific calibration, results show significant model sensitivity even for water. This effect increases for other fluids, such as CO2, which exhibit strong nonideal thermophysical properties. To enable reliable modeling for such fluids, it is essential to first identify which model parameters exert dominant influence. This study contributes by systematically varying model approaches and parameters. For both water and CO2, a test case of supersonic flow through a Laval nozzle is considered. The sensitivity study examines variations in the calculation of the critical energy barrier for nucleation, droplet growth rate, and type of modeling the droplet size distribution. A comparison of two fundamentally different numerical schemes further distinguishes the influence of physical modeling from that of numerical variability. Results for CO2 show a sensitivity to droplet size distribution modeling comparable to water, but with a broader spread for phase change modeling due to fluid nonidealities. These findings support a systematic uncertainty estimate for phase change modeling in turbomachinery operated with CO2 and point to the need for experimental validation of condensation models in nonideal fluids.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleSensitivity Analysis of Phase Change Modeling for Non-Ideal Fluids in Turbomachinery Applications
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume148
    journal issue7
    journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4070564
    treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian