YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • International Journal of Geomechanics
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • International Journal of Geomechanics
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Efficacy of Biopolymer Treatment in Improving the Dynamic Response of Fly Ash Deposits

    Source: International Journal of Geomechanics:;2024:;Volume ( 024 ):;issue: 012::page 04024288-1
    Author:
    L. Abhijith
    ,
    Kodi Rangaswamy
    ,
    Renjitha Mary Varghese
    DOI: 10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-9911
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The utilization of biopolymer treatment presents a sustainable and environmentally friendly alternative to traditional binders such as cement, lime, and chemicals and has the potential to mitigate the carbon footprint significantly. The guar gum (GG) biopolymer used in this investigation exhibits viscoelastic behavior and establishes strong bonds with the fine fly ash particles, enhancing the dynamic response of fly ash. A comparative analysis was conducted between untreated fly ash (UFA) and GG-treated fly ash (GGFA) in terms of dynamic properties and excess pore pressure (EPP) response using cyclic triaxial testing, considering different GG dosages (0.50%, 0.40%, 0.30%, and 0.20%), curing periods (7, 14, and 28 days), and cyclic shear strains (0.45%, 0.75%, 1.125%, 1.50%, and 1.875%). Test results revealed that only 0.50% of GG was required for optimal performance, very small compared to conventional binders. At optimal dosage of GG, the 28-day dynamic shear modulus and the damping ratio exhibit increases of 284% and 364%, respectively, whereas the EPP exhibits a reduction of 32% compared with UFA. Also, the stress paths of UFA and GGFA were developed to understand the dynamic response better. Microanalysis of UFA, 7-day-cured GGFA, and 28-day-cured GGFA showed evidence of binding networks between the GG and fly ash particles through a pore-clogging mechanism.
    • Download: (2.633Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Efficacy of Biopolymer Treatment in Improving the Dynamic Response of Fly Ash Deposits

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4304458
    Collections
    • International Journal of Geomechanics

    Show full item record

    contributor authorL. Abhijith
    contributor authorKodi Rangaswamy
    contributor authorRenjitha Mary Varghese
    date accessioned2025-04-20T10:19:06Z
    date available2025-04-20T10:19:06Z
    date copyright10/8/2024 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2024
    identifier otherIJGNAI.GMENG-9911.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4304458
    description abstractThe utilization of biopolymer treatment presents a sustainable and environmentally friendly alternative to traditional binders such as cement, lime, and chemicals and has the potential to mitigate the carbon footprint significantly. The guar gum (GG) biopolymer used in this investigation exhibits viscoelastic behavior and establishes strong bonds with the fine fly ash particles, enhancing the dynamic response of fly ash. A comparative analysis was conducted between untreated fly ash (UFA) and GG-treated fly ash (GGFA) in terms of dynamic properties and excess pore pressure (EPP) response using cyclic triaxial testing, considering different GG dosages (0.50%, 0.40%, 0.30%, and 0.20%), curing periods (7, 14, and 28 days), and cyclic shear strains (0.45%, 0.75%, 1.125%, 1.50%, and 1.875%). Test results revealed that only 0.50% of GG was required for optimal performance, very small compared to conventional binders. At optimal dosage of GG, the 28-day dynamic shear modulus and the damping ratio exhibit increases of 284% and 364%, respectively, whereas the EPP exhibits a reduction of 32% compared with UFA. Also, the stress paths of UFA and GGFA were developed to understand the dynamic response better. Microanalysis of UFA, 7-day-cured GGFA, and 28-day-cured GGFA showed evidence of binding networks between the GG and fly ash particles through a pore-clogging mechanism.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleEfficacy of Biopolymer Treatment in Improving the Dynamic Response of Fly Ash Deposits
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume24
    journal issue12
    journal titleInternational Journal of Geomechanics
    identifier doi10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-9911
    journal fristpage04024288-1
    journal lastpage04024288-17
    page17
    treeInternational Journal of Geomechanics:;2024:;Volume ( 024 ):;issue: 012
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian