Thermomechanical Behavior of Energy Piles with Different Roughness Values in Unsaturated Soil

Abstract

Energy piles are often partially or fully embedded in unsaturated soils, particularly in arid and semiarid regions; however, suction effects on their thermomechanical behavior have not been fully understood. In this study, a series of physical modeling tests were carried out to investigate the behavior of energy piles in unsaturated soils. The soil used for testing is completely decomposed granite, which is a type of clayey sand sampled from Hong Kong. Five constant-temperature pile load tests and three constant-load heating and cooling tests were conducted under different conditions of pile surface roughness and initial soil suction. It is observed that the ultimate capacity of the energy pile (Qult) increases as the initial suction increases from 0 to 90 kPa, the pile roughness increases from 0.05 to 1, and the temperature increases from 10°C to 21°C. Moreover, the effects of roughness are more significant in unsaturated conditions than in saturated states. A suction increment can increase both shaft and toe resistance, while temperature and roughness mainly affect the shaft resistance. During cyclic heating and cooling, suction and roughness increment reduces the irreversible pile head settlement due to the increment of shaft resistance. Furthermore, the irreversible pile head settlement is greatly affected by vertical load. When the working load is relatively small (smaller than 0.5Qult in this study), the settlement increases with the number of thermal cycles but at a decreasing rate for both saturated and unsaturated conditions, and finally reaches a stable state. When the working load is relatively high (0.7Qult in this study), the response of the pile does not reach a stable state in saturated conditions even after five thermal cycles. These observations should be treated with caution because they may be specific and only applicable to the case of no overburden pressure. Exercising caution is crucial when interpreting these observations, particularly at a quantitative level, because they may be limited to the test soil and the low stress level utilized in the physical model tests.