YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Characteristic Study of Polycarboxylate Ether Sand as a Potential Substitute for Natural River Sand in the Construction Industry

    Source: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 036 ):;issue: 006::page 04024137-1
    Author:
    Abhishek Khupsare
    ,
    Ajay Parmar
    ,
    Ajay K. Agarwal
    ,
    Swapnil P. Wanjari
    DOI: 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-17646
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: The extreme demand for aggregate leads to the exploitation of riverbeds for fine aggregates, affecting the environment adversely. Therefore, a suitable alternative to natural river sand is essentially required. This study focuses on preventing environmental impact by developing polycarboxylate ether (PCE) sand to replace natural river sand (NRS). Development of polycarboxylate ether (PCE) sand by mixing high-volume fly ash, bottom ash, cement, natural river sand, and locally purchased high-solid-content polycarboxylate ether–based superplasticizer (HSPCE). All the physical and chemical properties of PCE sand were observed and satisfied the requirement of current standards. PCE sand yields a good specific gravity of 2.31 and is classified as Zone I sand with a satisfactory friction angle (37°) compared with NRS and geopolymer fly ash sand (GFS). Although the water absorption (6.83%) and pH (12.18) are slightly more than those of GFS and NRS, the alkali silica reaction and soundness are well within the permissible limit as per Indian standards. The chemical analysis by X-ray fluorescence showed the presence of high amounts of SiO2 and Al2O3 with magnitudes of 58.879%, and 26.77%, respectively. Finally, the compressive strength of M25 grade concrete using PCE sand and GFS was observed to be 87.51% and 83.82% with respect to NRS after 28 days, respectively. The results of this study indicate that PCE sand can be a good alternative to NRS for construction work because it not only reduces the environmental effect due to sand mining but also focuses on utilizing fly ash and bottom ash.
    • Download: (2.108Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Characteristic Study of Polycarboxylate Ether Sand as a Potential Substitute for Natural River Sand in the Construction Industry

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4296539
    Collections
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAbhishek Khupsare
    contributor authorAjay Parmar
    contributor authorAjay K. Agarwal
    contributor authorSwapnil P. Wanjari
    date accessioned2024-04-27T22:23:13Z
    date available2024-04-27T22:23:13Z
    date issued2024/06/01
    identifier other10.1061-JMCEE7.MTENG-17646.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4296539
    description abstractThe extreme demand for aggregate leads to the exploitation of riverbeds for fine aggregates, affecting the environment adversely. Therefore, a suitable alternative to natural river sand is essentially required. This study focuses on preventing environmental impact by developing polycarboxylate ether (PCE) sand to replace natural river sand (NRS). Development of polycarboxylate ether (PCE) sand by mixing high-volume fly ash, bottom ash, cement, natural river sand, and locally purchased high-solid-content polycarboxylate ether–based superplasticizer (HSPCE). All the physical and chemical properties of PCE sand were observed and satisfied the requirement of current standards. PCE sand yields a good specific gravity of 2.31 and is classified as Zone I sand with a satisfactory friction angle (37°) compared with NRS and geopolymer fly ash sand (GFS). Although the water absorption (6.83%) and pH (12.18) are slightly more than those of GFS and NRS, the alkali silica reaction and soundness are well within the permissible limit as per Indian standards. The chemical analysis by X-ray fluorescence showed the presence of high amounts of SiO2 and Al2O3 with magnitudes of 58.879%, and 26.77%, respectively. Finally, the compressive strength of M25 grade concrete using PCE sand and GFS was observed to be 87.51% and 83.82% with respect to NRS after 28 days, respectively. The results of this study indicate that PCE sand can be a good alternative to NRS for construction work because it not only reduces the environmental effect due to sand mining but also focuses on utilizing fly ash and bottom ash.
    publisherASCE
    titleCharacteristic Study of Polycarboxylate Ether Sand as a Potential Substitute for Natural River Sand in the Construction Industry
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume36
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-17646
    journal fristpage04024137-1
    journal lastpage04024137-11
    page11
    treeJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 036 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian