YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Cost-Effective Use of Reclaimed Asphalt Mixtures with Various Rubber Modification Technologies for Pavement Maintenance Applications

    Source: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 036 ):;issue: 004::page 04024008-1
    Author:
    Salih Kocak
    DOI: 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-17174
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: The use of sustainable materials in road construction has been gaining popularity to provide a better future for the next generations. This study investigates the possible use of two common sustainable road construction materials, recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) and recycled tire rubber (RTR), for pavement maintenance applications. Mixtures were produced either with combined RAP and RTRs or 100% RAP with petroleum-based (RAP-A) and bio-based (RAP-B) rejuvenating oils. Because pavement maintenance applications such as pothole patching have traditionally been performed with cold mixtures (CM), a typical cold patching mixture was also investigated along with six hot asphalt mixtures. RTR mixtures were produced using different rubber modification technologies. They were manufactured using crumb rubber wet (WET), crumb rubber dry (DRY), devulcanized rubber (DEV), and crumb rubber terminal blend (TB) technologies. Each RTR-modified mixture included 40% RAP and approximately 12% rubber content by weight of the binder. The performance of the mixtures was compared using dynamic modus (DM) testing for linear viscoelastic characterization, flow number (FN) testing for rutting potential, and tensile strength ratio (TSR) testing for moisture susceptibility. The cost-effectiveness of different mixtures was performed using the life cycle cost analyses (LCCA) approach for bituminous materials. The results showed that any recycled hot-mix asphalt outperformed the CM. The 100% hot RAP mixture with petroleum-based rejuvenator performed as well as any combined RTR-RAP mixtures, and it became the most cost-effective alternative for pavement maintenance applications.
    • Download: (1.432Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Cost-Effective Use of Reclaimed Asphalt Mixtures with Various Rubber Modification Technologies for Pavement Maintenance Applications

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4296500
    Collections
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSalih Kocak
    date accessioned2024-04-27T22:22:06Z
    date available2024-04-27T22:22:06Z
    date issued2024/04/01
    identifier other10.1061-JMCEE7.MTENG-17174.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4296500
    description abstractThe use of sustainable materials in road construction has been gaining popularity to provide a better future for the next generations. This study investigates the possible use of two common sustainable road construction materials, recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) and recycled tire rubber (RTR), for pavement maintenance applications. Mixtures were produced either with combined RAP and RTRs or 100% RAP with petroleum-based (RAP-A) and bio-based (RAP-B) rejuvenating oils. Because pavement maintenance applications such as pothole patching have traditionally been performed with cold mixtures (CM), a typical cold patching mixture was also investigated along with six hot asphalt mixtures. RTR mixtures were produced using different rubber modification technologies. They were manufactured using crumb rubber wet (WET), crumb rubber dry (DRY), devulcanized rubber (DEV), and crumb rubber terminal blend (TB) technologies. Each RTR-modified mixture included 40% RAP and approximately 12% rubber content by weight of the binder. The performance of the mixtures was compared using dynamic modus (DM) testing for linear viscoelastic characterization, flow number (FN) testing for rutting potential, and tensile strength ratio (TSR) testing for moisture susceptibility. The cost-effectiveness of different mixtures was performed using the life cycle cost analyses (LCCA) approach for bituminous materials. The results showed that any recycled hot-mix asphalt outperformed the CM. The 100% hot RAP mixture with petroleum-based rejuvenator performed as well as any combined RTR-RAP mixtures, and it became the most cost-effective alternative for pavement maintenance applications.
    publisherASCE
    titleCost-Effective Use of Reclaimed Asphalt Mixtures with Various Rubber Modification Technologies for Pavement Maintenance Applications
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume36
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-17174
    journal fristpage04024008-1
    journal lastpage04024008-10
    page10
    treeJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 036 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian