Performance of Geogrid-Reinforced Rubber-Coated Ballast and Natural Ballast Mix under Direct Shear Conditions

Abstract

Rubber-coated ballast (RCB) is a new innovative ballast aggregate obtained by coating natural aggregates with recycled crumb rubber by using polyurethane binder. The objective of RCB is to reduce the ballast degradation, thereby reducing the deterioration of rail track geometry and also maintenance costs. Natural ballast; crumb rubber of sizes 0.4, 0.8, and 2 mm; Elastan polyurethane; and geogrid (triangular, 69 mm aperture size) were used in this study. The results of abrasion, impact value, and soundness tests show that RCB has a higher resistance to abrasion, impact, and weathering compared to natural ballast. Subsequently, the shear behavior and particle breakage of natural ballast, RCB, unreinforced, and geogrid-reinforced RCB–natural ballast mix was explored using the large-scale direct shear apparatus at different normal stresses and shearing rates (Sr). The test results indicate that due to rubber coating the peak friction angle (φ) of RCB samples reduces as compared to natural ballast. The reduction in φ of RCB samples is attributed to a change in surface texture. Moreover, 0.4-RCB (RCB made with rubber crumbs of size 0.4 mm) shows the least reduction in φ compared to 0.8-RCB and 2-RCB (RCB made with rubber crumbs of size 0.8 and 2 mm). It was further observed that with the increase in proportion of 0.4-RCB in geogrid-reinforced natural ballast both the peak friction angle and particle breakage (Bg) of ballast decreased significantly. The current study established the optimum content of 0.4-RCB to be mixed with geogrid-reinforced natural ballast to be in the range of 44%–53%. The problem of excessive degradation of ballast particles and the associated changes in the track geometry owing to the repeated application of heavy axle loads is addressed by coating the natural ballast with crumb rubber generated from waste tires. The rubber-coated ballast (RCB) is found to offer better abrasion, impact, and weathering resistance when compared to natural ballast. Moreover, it undergoes negligible particle breakage under direct shear conditions. The decrease in the extent of particle breakage helps in reducing the frequency of ballast replacement operations and hence tracks maintenance costs. Furthermore, RCB, when reinforced with geogrid, offers better shear strength than that of natural ballast alone. These observations imply that the tracks with geogrid-reinforced RCB can effectively reduce the risk of track instability.