YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Relief Wells for Dams and Levees Considering Landward Head

    Source: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2023:;Volume ( 149 ):;issue: 011::page 04023092-1
    Author:
    Andrew M. Keffer
    ,
    Erich D. Guy
    DOI: 10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-10671
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Relief well systems for dams and levees are often designed and analyzed as an infinite line using average and midwell heads. Well discharge and excess head in the foundation are calculated by adjusting the solution of a continuous slot to account for additional head losses as flow lines converge to wells. The average and midwell uplift factors allow this by representing the effects of well system geometry and foundation depth in discharge and excess head equations. For partial penetration systems, upwelling may occur landward of the well line with head exceeding that in between the wells. Therefore, without a method for estimating landward head, the average value in the plane of the wells has historically been used as a conservative design value. This approach is better than considering the midwell uplift alone, but in some cases, it can lead to costly overdesign when the landward head is substantially less than the average. Uplift beyond an infinite well line is complicated as its behavior also depends on the ratio of the effective seepage exit distance to well spacing. A third so-called landward uplift factor was developed through finite-element modeling to improve the accuracy of the design process. It allows for a more comprehensive understanding of excess head distribution and for certain scenarios, such as low well penetration and high pressure confinement, improves design head accuracy by one-third to 1 m compared to the average head-based design approach. New charts and equations for each of the uplift factors are provided, along with an example problem to aid the practitioner in efficient graphical problem solution and finite-element model verification.
    • Download: (2.443Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Relief Wells for Dams and Levees Considering Landward Head

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4293537
    Collections
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAndrew M. Keffer
    contributor authorErich D. Guy
    date accessioned2023-11-27T23:24:48Z
    date available2023-11-27T23:24:48Z
    date issued8/18/2023 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2023-08-18
    identifier otherJGGEFK.GTENG-10671.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4293537
    description abstractRelief well systems for dams and levees are often designed and analyzed as an infinite line using average and midwell heads. Well discharge and excess head in the foundation are calculated by adjusting the solution of a continuous slot to account for additional head losses as flow lines converge to wells. The average and midwell uplift factors allow this by representing the effects of well system geometry and foundation depth in discharge and excess head equations. For partial penetration systems, upwelling may occur landward of the well line with head exceeding that in between the wells. Therefore, without a method for estimating landward head, the average value in the plane of the wells has historically been used as a conservative design value. This approach is better than considering the midwell uplift alone, but in some cases, it can lead to costly overdesign when the landward head is substantially less than the average. Uplift beyond an infinite well line is complicated as its behavior also depends on the ratio of the effective seepage exit distance to well spacing. A third so-called landward uplift factor was developed through finite-element modeling to improve the accuracy of the design process. It allows for a more comprehensive understanding of excess head distribution and for certain scenarios, such as low well penetration and high pressure confinement, improves design head accuracy by one-third to 1 m compared to the average head-based design approach. New charts and equations for each of the uplift factors are provided, along with an example problem to aid the practitioner in efficient graphical problem solution and finite-element model verification.
    publisherASCE
    titleRelief Wells for Dams and Levees Considering Landward Head
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume149
    journal issue11
    journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-10671
    journal fristpage04023092-1
    journal lastpage04023092-13
    page13
    treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2023:;Volume ( 149 ):;issue: 011
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian