YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Mechanical and Economic Evaluation of Recycled Concrete Aggregate as Granular Road Base and Subbase Material

    Source: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2023:;Volume ( 035 ):;issue: 005::page 04023097-1
    Author:
    Ekrem Burak Toka
    ,
    Murat Olgun
    DOI: 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-14388
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: In this study, the usability of recycled concrete aggregates (RCAs) together with crushed aggregate (CA) in granular road base (GRB) and granular road subbase (GRSB) layers was investigated. Three different RCAs as RCA1, RCA2, and RCA3 were used according to their parent concrete compressive strength. The performance of the designs created by mixing three different RCAs with CA at 25%–50%–75% by mass was examined by laboratory tests [modified Proctor, California bearing ratio (CBR), permeability, resilient modulus, and plastic deformation]. CBR values for pure RCAs were higher than 100% and the CBR values were decreased for the mixture designs. Permeability coefficient (k) values of the CA and RCAs were close to each other. Resilient modulus (Mr) values were evaluated for three different models. In general, the lowest Mr values were obtained for pure RCAs, while the highest Mr value was obtained for pure CA. There was no statistically significant correlation between Mr values and CBR values. The plastic deformation (εp) value of the pure CA was significantly smaller than the εp values obtained for the pure RCAs and mixture designs. The RCAs generally increased the εp values. Flexible pavement thickness and cost analyses were performed for the 50CA 50RCA2 design, which was determined to be the most suitable for GRB material, 100RCA2, and 100CA designs for comparison. The 50CA 50RCA2 design reduced the GRB cost by 13% compared to using pure CA. As a result, it was determined that 50% RCA in GRB reduced the cost and had no adverse effect considering the material properties. Recycling of concrete wastes in this way can make significant contributions to reducing environmental pollution and prevent the depletion of natural resources.
    • Download: (799.0Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Mechanical and Economic Evaluation of Recycled Concrete Aggregate as Granular Road Base and Subbase Material

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4292951
    Collections
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorEkrem Burak Toka
    contributor authorMurat Olgun
    date accessioned2023-08-16T19:13:07Z
    date available2023-08-16T19:13:07Z
    date issued2023/05/01
    identifier otherJMCEE7.MTENG-14388.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4292951
    description abstractIn this study, the usability of recycled concrete aggregates (RCAs) together with crushed aggregate (CA) in granular road base (GRB) and granular road subbase (GRSB) layers was investigated. Three different RCAs as RCA1, RCA2, and RCA3 were used according to their parent concrete compressive strength. The performance of the designs created by mixing three different RCAs with CA at 25%–50%–75% by mass was examined by laboratory tests [modified Proctor, California bearing ratio (CBR), permeability, resilient modulus, and plastic deformation]. CBR values for pure RCAs were higher than 100% and the CBR values were decreased for the mixture designs. Permeability coefficient (k) values of the CA and RCAs were close to each other. Resilient modulus (Mr) values were evaluated for three different models. In general, the lowest Mr values were obtained for pure RCAs, while the highest Mr value was obtained for pure CA. There was no statistically significant correlation between Mr values and CBR values. The plastic deformation (εp) value of the pure CA was significantly smaller than the εp values obtained for the pure RCAs and mixture designs. The RCAs generally increased the εp values. Flexible pavement thickness and cost analyses were performed for the 50CA 50RCA2 design, which was determined to be the most suitable for GRB material, 100RCA2, and 100CA designs for comparison. The 50CA 50RCA2 design reduced the GRB cost by 13% compared to using pure CA. As a result, it was determined that 50% RCA in GRB reduced the cost and had no adverse effect considering the material properties. Recycling of concrete wastes in this way can make significant contributions to reducing environmental pollution and prevent the depletion of natural resources.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleMechanical and Economic Evaluation of Recycled Concrete Aggregate as Granular Road Base and Subbase Material
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume35
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-14388
    journal fristpage04023097-1
    journal lastpage04023097-14
    page14
    treeJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2023:;Volume ( 035 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian