YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Optimism Bias in Bidding: Contractors’ Horizontally Biased Estimating Behavior

    Source: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2023:;Volume ( 015 ):;issue: 002::page 04523004-1
    Author:
    Young Joo Kim
    ,
    Miroslaw J. Skibniewski
    DOI: 10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-845
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: In the construction management literature, it is not an ultimately settled matter that optimism bias is one of the undisputed factors or reasons affecting cost underestimation and cost overrun. This study tried to answer whether bidders—usually legal entities, not natural persons—would exhibit optimism bias-like behavior when bidding for construction projects and whether financial ramifications would follow. Two hundred eighty-six projects delivered to the Ohio Department of Transportation between 2011 and 2020 were analyzed to test the proposed hypothesis. It was observed that bidders were more optimistically biased when bidding for long-duration projects than short-duration projects. The observation strengthens the causal nature between optimism bias and cost underestimation and encourages stakeholders to develop internal or external monitoring systems that call out optimism bias at the organizational level. Project-based organizations, such as engineering and construction firms, generally have the function of estimating. Prior research has shown that individual estimators are subject to various cognitive biases, including optimism bias; in other words, estimators may feel overly confident about the chance of favorable outcomes. However, such estimators hardly work individually; instead, estimators work as teams, especially for large and complex projects, to estimate the cost of projects as accurately as possible. The observation reported in this paper strengthens the argument that such teams are subject to optimism bias-like group behavior, and such behavior is time dependent. Therefore, project-based organizations are advised to investigate their historic cost data to see whether their records show horizontally biased estimating behavior. In addition, project-based firms are advised to establish internal steps to remind their estimation teams of their tendency to overestimate the chance of favorable outcomes, especially when estimating long project horizons.
    • Download: (510.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Optimism Bias in Bidding: Contractors’ Horizontally Biased Estimating Behavior

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4292862
    Collections
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction

    Show full item record

    contributor authorYoung Joo Kim
    contributor authorMiroslaw J. Skibniewski
    date accessioned2023-08-16T19:09:58Z
    date available2023-08-16T19:09:58Z
    date issued2023/05/01
    identifier otherJLADAH.LADR-845.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4292862
    description abstractIn the construction management literature, it is not an ultimately settled matter that optimism bias is one of the undisputed factors or reasons affecting cost underestimation and cost overrun. This study tried to answer whether bidders—usually legal entities, not natural persons—would exhibit optimism bias-like behavior when bidding for construction projects and whether financial ramifications would follow. Two hundred eighty-six projects delivered to the Ohio Department of Transportation between 2011 and 2020 were analyzed to test the proposed hypothesis. It was observed that bidders were more optimistically biased when bidding for long-duration projects than short-duration projects. The observation strengthens the causal nature between optimism bias and cost underestimation and encourages stakeholders to develop internal or external monitoring systems that call out optimism bias at the organizational level. Project-based organizations, such as engineering and construction firms, generally have the function of estimating. Prior research has shown that individual estimators are subject to various cognitive biases, including optimism bias; in other words, estimators may feel overly confident about the chance of favorable outcomes. However, such estimators hardly work individually; instead, estimators work as teams, especially for large and complex projects, to estimate the cost of projects as accurately as possible. The observation reported in this paper strengthens the argument that such teams are subject to optimism bias-like group behavior, and such behavior is time dependent. Therefore, project-based organizations are advised to investigate their historic cost data to see whether their records show horizontally biased estimating behavior. In addition, project-based firms are advised to establish internal steps to remind their estimation teams of their tendency to overestimate the chance of favorable outcomes, especially when estimating long project horizons.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleOptimism Bias in Bidding: Contractors’ Horizontally Biased Estimating Behavior
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume15
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    identifier doi10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-845
    journal fristpage04523004-1
    journal lastpage04523004-11
    page11
    treeJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2023:;Volume ( 015 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian