Influence of Facade Structure, Glazing Type, and Window-to-Wall Ratio on the Energy Performance of a Detached Residential Building with a SunspaceSource: Journal of Energy Engineering:;2023:;Volume ( 149 ):;issue: 001::page 04022046-1DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000875Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: This paper discusses the influence of passive façade design of a detached residential building on its energy performance. The research consists of a parameter analysis performed using commercially available software to assess the influence of different façade wall structures, glazing types, and window-to-wall ratios (WWRs) on the energy required for heating and cooling of a detached building with a sunspace. Eighteen variants of façade wall structure (W1–W18) and 20 variants of façade window glazing type (G1–G20) were created for the base model of a building with a sunspace (Model-FW) for the purpose of investigating their influence on energy consumption in the building. All variants of the base model were examined for WWR=20%, WWR=40%, and WWR=60%. The research was conducted for the location of the urban area in the city of Niš, Serbia. The analysis of the results showed that the best-performing façade wall structure in terms of heating energy consumption was Variant W1, which consists of a 0.40-m-thick concrete layer, 0.14-m-thick expanded polystyrene (EPS) thermal insulation layer, and a render/plaster layer on the outside and the inside with the total thickness of 0.03 m. The W1 variant had the largest thermal mass and thermal insulation thickness of all considered variants. Regarding the total energy required for heating and cooling, in the most favorable W1 model, the energy savings were 75.14% (WWR=20%), 35.04% (WWR=40%), and 17.15% (WWR=60%). The analysis of different glazing types showed that triple low-emissivity glazing performed the best in terms of heating energy required for a building with a sunspace. Among the considered models, benefits from triple glazing systems in terms of total energy consumption were 41.59%, 61.04%, and 47.70% for WWR=20%, WWR=40%, and WWR=60%, respectively.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Ana Vukadinović | |
| contributor author | Jasmina Radosavljević | |
| contributor author | Amelija Đorđević | |
| contributor author | Milan Protić | |
| date accessioned | 2023-08-16T19:06:32Z | |
| date available | 2023-08-16T19:06:32Z | |
| date issued | 2023/02/01 | |
| identifier other | (ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000875.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4292767 | |
| description abstract | This paper discusses the influence of passive façade design of a detached residential building on its energy performance. The research consists of a parameter analysis performed using commercially available software to assess the influence of different façade wall structures, glazing types, and window-to-wall ratios (WWRs) on the energy required for heating and cooling of a detached building with a sunspace. Eighteen variants of façade wall structure (W1–W18) and 20 variants of façade window glazing type (G1–G20) were created for the base model of a building with a sunspace (Model-FW) for the purpose of investigating their influence on energy consumption in the building. All variants of the base model were examined for WWR=20%, WWR=40%, and WWR=60%. The research was conducted for the location of the urban area in the city of Niš, Serbia. The analysis of the results showed that the best-performing façade wall structure in terms of heating energy consumption was Variant W1, which consists of a 0.40-m-thick concrete layer, 0.14-m-thick expanded polystyrene (EPS) thermal insulation layer, and a render/plaster layer on the outside and the inside with the total thickness of 0.03 m. The W1 variant had the largest thermal mass and thermal insulation thickness of all considered variants. Regarding the total energy required for heating and cooling, in the most favorable W1 model, the energy savings were 75.14% (WWR=20%), 35.04% (WWR=40%), and 17.15% (WWR=60%). The analysis of different glazing types showed that triple low-emissivity glazing performed the best in terms of heating energy required for a building with a sunspace. Among the considered models, benefits from triple glazing systems in terms of total energy consumption were 41.59%, 61.04%, and 47.70% for WWR=20%, WWR=40%, and WWR=60%, respectively. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Influence of Facade Structure, Glazing Type, and Window-to-Wall Ratio on the Energy Performance of a Detached Residential Building with a Sunspace | |
| type | Journal Article | |
| journal volume | 149 | |
| journal issue | 1 | |
| journal title | Journal of Energy Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000875 | |
| journal fristpage | 04022046-1 | |
| journal lastpage | 04022046-14 | |
| page | 14 | |
| tree | Journal of Energy Engineering:;2023:;Volume ( 149 ):;issue: 001 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |