YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Numerical and Experimental Analysis of the Cold Flow Physics of a Nonpremixed Industrial Gas Burner

    Source: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2023:;volume( 145 ):;issue: 008::page 81202-1
    Author:
    Ortolani, A.
    ,
    Yeadon, J.
    ,
    Ruane, B.
    ,
    Paul, M.
    ,
    Campobasso, M. S.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4062165
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The flow field of a nonpremixed industrial gas burner is analyzed with Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes computational fluid dynamics validated against velocity and pressure measurements. Combustion is not modeled because the aim is optimizing the predictive capabilities of the cold flow before including chemistry. The system's complex flow physics, affected by a 90 deg turn, backward and forward facing steps, and transversal jets in the mainstream is investigated at full and partial load. The sensitivity of the computed flow field to inflow boundary condition setup, approach for resolving/modeling wall-bounded flows, and turbulence closure is assessed. In the first sensitivity analysis, the inflow boundary condition is prescribed using measured total pressure or measured velocity field. In the second, boundary layers are resolved down to the wall or modeled with wall functions. In the third sensitivity analysis, the turbulence closure uses the k−ω shear stress transport eddy viscosity model or two variants of the Reynolds stress model. The agreement between the predictions of most simulation setups among themselves and with the measurements is good. For a given type of inflow condition and wall flow treatment, the ω-based Reynolds stress model gives the best agreement with measurements among the considered turbulence models at full load. At partial load, the comparison with measured data highlights some scatter in the predictions of different patterns of the flow measurements. Overall, the findings of this study provide insight into the fluid dynamics of industrial gas burners and guidelines for their simulation-based analysis.
    • Download: (5.517Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Numerical and Experimental Analysis of the Cold Flow Physics of a Nonpremixed Industrial Gas Burner

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4291787
    Collections
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorOrtolani, A.
    contributor authorYeadon, J.
    contributor authorRuane, B.
    contributor authorPaul, M.
    contributor authorCampobasso, M. S.
    date accessioned2023-08-16T18:17:52Z
    date available2023-08-16T18:17:52Z
    date copyright4/24/2023 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2023
    identifier issn0098-2202
    identifier otherfe_145_08_081202.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4291787
    description abstractThe flow field of a nonpremixed industrial gas burner is analyzed with Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes computational fluid dynamics validated against velocity and pressure measurements. Combustion is not modeled because the aim is optimizing the predictive capabilities of the cold flow before including chemistry. The system's complex flow physics, affected by a 90 deg turn, backward and forward facing steps, and transversal jets in the mainstream is investigated at full and partial load. The sensitivity of the computed flow field to inflow boundary condition setup, approach for resolving/modeling wall-bounded flows, and turbulence closure is assessed. In the first sensitivity analysis, the inflow boundary condition is prescribed using measured total pressure or measured velocity field. In the second, boundary layers are resolved down to the wall or modeled with wall functions. In the third sensitivity analysis, the turbulence closure uses the k−ω shear stress transport eddy viscosity model or two variants of the Reynolds stress model. The agreement between the predictions of most simulation setups among themselves and with the measurements is good. For a given type of inflow condition and wall flow treatment, the ω-based Reynolds stress model gives the best agreement with measurements among the considered turbulence models at full load. At partial load, the comparison with measured data highlights some scatter in the predictions of different patterns of the flow measurements. Overall, the findings of this study provide insight into the fluid dynamics of industrial gas burners and guidelines for their simulation-based analysis.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleNumerical and Experimental Analysis of the Cold Flow Physics of a Nonpremixed Industrial Gas Burner
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume145
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4062165
    journal fristpage81202-1
    journal lastpage81202-16
    page16
    treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;2023:;volume( 145 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian