Postprocessing of Ensemble Weather Forecast Using Decision Tree–Based Probabilistic Forecasting MethodsSource: Weather and Forecasting:;2022:;volume( 038 ):;issue: 001::page 69DOI: 10.1175/WAF-D-22-0006.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: Producing an accurate and calibrated probabilistic forecast has high social and economic value. Systematic errors or biases in the ensemble weather forecast can be corrected by postprocessing models whose development is an urgent challenge. Traditionally, the bias correction is done by employing linear regression models that estimate the conditional probability distribution of the forecast. Although this model framework works well, it is restricted to a prespecified model form that often relies on a limited set of predictors only. Most machine learning (ML) methods can tackle these problems with a point prediction, but only a few of them can be applied effectively in a probabilistic manner. The tree-based ML techniques, namely, natural gradient boosting (NGB), quantile random forests (QRF), and distributional regression forests (DRF), are used to adjust hourly 2-m temperature ensemble prediction at lead times of 1–10 days. The ensemble model output statistics (EMOS) and its boosting version are used as benchmark models. The model forecast is based on the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) for the Czech Republic domain. Two training periods 2015–18 and 2018 only were used to learn the models, and their prediction skill was evaluated in 2019. The results show that the QRF and NGB methods provide the best performance for 1–2-day forecasts, while the EMOS method outperforms other methods for 8–10-day forecasts. Key components to improving short-term forecasting are additional atmospheric/surface state predictors and the 4-yr training sample size.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Patrik Benáček | |
| contributor author | Aleš Farda | |
| contributor author | Petr Štěpánek | |
| date accessioned | 2023-04-12T18:46:45Z | |
| date available | 2023-04-12T18:46:45Z | |
| date copyright | 2022/12/29 | |
| date issued | 2022 | |
| identifier other | WAF-D-22-0006.1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4290236 | |
| description abstract | Producing an accurate and calibrated probabilistic forecast has high social and economic value. Systematic errors or biases in the ensemble weather forecast can be corrected by postprocessing models whose development is an urgent challenge. Traditionally, the bias correction is done by employing linear regression models that estimate the conditional probability distribution of the forecast. Although this model framework works well, it is restricted to a prespecified model form that often relies on a limited set of predictors only. Most machine learning (ML) methods can tackle these problems with a point prediction, but only a few of them can be applied effectively in a probabilistic manner. The tree-based ML techniques, namely, natural gradient boosting (NGB), quantile random forests (QRF), and distributional regression forests (DRF), are used to adjust hourly 2-m temperature ensemble prediction at lead times of 1–10 days. The ensemble model output statistics (EMOS) and its boosting version are used as benchmark models. The model forecast is based on the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) for the Czech Republic domain. Two training periods 2015–18 and 2018 only were used to learn the models, and their prediction skill was evaluated in 2019. The results show that the QRF and NGB methods provide the best performance for 1–2-day forecasts, while the EMOS method outperforms other methods for 8–10-day forecasts. Key components to improving short-term forecasting are additional atmospheric/surface state predictors and the 4-yr training sample size. | |
| publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
| title | Postprocessing of Ensemble Weather Forecast Using Decision Tree–Based Probabilistic Forecasting Methods | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 38 | |
| journal issue | 1 | |
| journal title | Weather and Forecasting | |
| identifier doi | 10.1175/WAF-D-22-0006.1 | |
| journal fristpage | 69 | |
| journal lastpage | 82 | |
| page | 69–82 | |
| tree | Weather and Forecasting:;2022:;volume( 038 ):;issue: 001 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |