YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Activity Recognition With Machine Learning in Manual Grinding

    Source: Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering:;2022:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 009::page 94504
    Author:
    Dörr, Matthias;Spoden, Frederik;Matthiesen, Sven;Gwosch, Thomas
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4054905
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Capturing data about manual processes and manual machining steps is important in manufacturing for better traceability, optimization, and better planning. Current manufacturing research focuses on sensor-based recognition of manual activities across multiple tools or power tools, but little on recognition within a versatile power tool type. Due to the strong influence of operator skill on process performance and consistency as well as many disturbance variables, activity recognition is a challenge in manual grinding. It is unclear how accurately manual activities can be recognized within one handheld grinder type across diverse trials. Therefore, this article investigates how manual activities can be recognized in diverse trials within an angle grinder type in a leave-one-trial-out cross-validation in comparison to classical cross-validation to identify the effect of diverse trials with four different classifies. An experimental study was conducted to collect measurement data with data loggers attached to two angle grinders, four manual activities with different abrasive tools, and three operators. Results show very good accuracies (97.68%) with cross-validation and worse accuracies (70.48%) with leave-one-trial-out cross-validation for the ensemble learning classifier. This means that recognition of the four chosen manual activities within an angle grinder is feasible but depends on how much the trial deviates from the reference training data. For further research on activity recognition in manual manufacturing, we propose the explicit consideration and evaluation of disturbance variables and diversity in data collection for the training of machine learning models.
    • Download: (637.6Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Activity Recognition With Machine Learning in Manual Grinding

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4288289
    Collections
    • Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDörr, Matthias;Spoden, Frederik;Matthiesen, Sven;Gwosch, Thomas
    date accessioned2022-12-27T23:17:06Z
    date available2022-12-27T23:17:06Z
    date copyright7/29/2022 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2022
    identifier issn1087-1357
    identifier othermanu_144_9_094504.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4288289
    description abstractCapturing data about manual processes and manual machining steps is important in manufacturing for better traceability, optimization, and better planning. Current manufacturing research focuses on sensor-based recognition of manual activities across multiple tools or power tools, but little on recognition within a versatile power tool type. Due to the strong influence of operator skill on process performance and consistency as well as many disturbance variables, activity recognition is a challenge in manual grinding. It is unclear how accurately manual activities can be recognized within one handheld grinder type across diverse trials. Therefore, this article investigates how manual activities can be recognized in diverse trials within an angle grinder type in a leave-one-trial-out cross-validation in comparison to classical cross-validation to identify the effect of diverse trials with four different classifies. An experimental study was conducted to collect measurement data with data loggers attached to two angle grinders, four manual activities with different abrasive tools, and three operators. Results show very good accuracies (97.68%) with cross-validation and worse accuracies (70.48%) with leave-one-trial-out cross-validation for the ensemble learning classifier. This means that recognition of the four chosen manual activities within an angle grinder is feasible but depends on how much the trial deviates from the reference training data. For further research on activity recognition in manual manufacturing, we propose the explicit consideration and evaluation of disturbance variables and diversity in data collection for the training of machine learning models.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleActivity Recognition With Machine Learning in Manual Grinding
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume144
    journal issue9
    journal titleJournal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4054905
    journal fristpage94504
    journal lastpage94504_7
    page7
    treeJournal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering:;2022:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian