YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Drained Axial Pipe-Soil Resistance at Low Confinement Using Tilt Table and Direct Shear Tests

    Source: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 148 ):;issue: 011::page 04022086
    Author:
    Roba Houhou
    ,
    Rayan Bou Mjahed
    ,
    Salah Sadek
    ,
    Shadi Najjar
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002903
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Establishing a reliable value for the axial pipe–soil interface resistance is critical for the design of offshore pipelines. Over the last few years, several independent research groups have modified existing methodologies or devised new testing setups to further develop our understanding of the behavior of the pipe–soil interface at low contact stresses. The most common laboratory experimental methods adopted have been based on either tilt table tests or interface direct shear tests. However, a direct comparison between the results of these two testing methodologies has not been established. This paper aims at designing and fabricating a tilt table and interface direct shear setup capable of accurately estimating the drained interface resistance at low normal stresses, in addition to comparing their results under identical testing conditions. Both setups tested the drained clay–solid interface response by varying the soil composition (high and low plasticity clay), the interface roughness (smooth and rough), and the normal stress range. Results showed that the drained residual failure envelopes for the clays and clay–solid interfaces were nonlinear and could be modeled by a simple power model. The interface response was clearly dependent on the interface roughness, particularly when the roughness was normalized with the mean grain size. In the case of smooth interfaces, identical friction angles were obtained from the tilt table and the interface direct shear, whereas in the case of rough interfaces, the interface direct shear yielded lower friction angle values.
    • Download: (6.490Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Drained Axial Pipe-Soil Resistance at Low Confinement Using Tilt Table and Direct Shear Tests

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4287683
    Collections
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorRoba Houhou
    contributor authorRayan Bou Mjahed
    contributor authorSalah Sadek
    contributor authorShadi Najjar
    date accessioned2022-12-27T20:37:47Z
    date available2022-12-27T20:37:47Z
    date issued2022/11/01
    identifier other(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002903.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4287683
    description abstractEstablishing a reliable value for the axial pipe–soil interface resistance is critical for the design of offshore pipelines. Over the last few years, several independent research groups have modified existing methodologies or devised new testing setups to further develop our understanding of the behavior of the pipe–soil interface at low contact stresses. The most common laboratory experimental methods adopted have been based on either tilt table tests or interface direct shear tests. However, a direct comparison between the results of these two testing methodologies has not been established. This paper aims at designing and fabricating a tilt table and interface direct shear setup capable of accurately estimating the drained interface resistance at low normal stresses, in addition to comparing their results under identical testing conditions. Both setups tested the drained clay–solid interface response by varying the soil composition (high and low plasticity clay), the interface roughness (smooth and rough), and the normal stress range. Results showed that the drained residual failure envelopes for the clays and clay–solid interfaces were nonlinear and could be modeled by a simple power model. The interface response was clearly dependent on the interface roughness, particularly when the roughness was normalized with the mean grain size. In the case of smooth interfaces, identical friction angles were obtained from the tilt table and the interface direct shear, whereas in the case of rough interfaces, the interface direct shear yielded lower friction angle values.
    publisherASCE
    titleDrained Axial Pipe-Soil Resistance at Low Confinement Using Tilt Table and Direct Shear Tests
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume148
    journal issue11
    journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002903
    journal fristpage04022086
    journal lastpage04022086_17
    page17
    treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 148 ):;issue: 011
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian