YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Heat Transfer
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Heat Transfer
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Revisiting the Schrage Equation for Kinetically Limited Evaporation and Condensation

    Source: Journal of Heat Transfer:;2022:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 008::page 80802-1
    Author:
    Vaartstra
    ,
    Geoffrey;Lu
    ,
    Zhengmao;Lienhard
    ,
    John H.;Wang
    ,
    Evelyn N.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4054382
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The Schrage equation is commonly used in thermofluid engineering to model high-rate liquid–vapor phase change of pure fluids. Although shortcomings of this simple model were pointed out decades ago and more rigorous models have emerged from the kinetic theory community, Schrage's equation continues to be widely used. In this paper, we quantify the accuracy of the Schrage equation for evaporation and condensation of monatomic and polyatomic fluids at the low to moderately high flux operating conditions relevant to thermofluid engineering applications. As a high-accuracy reference, we numerically solve a Bhatnagar, Gross, and Krook (BGK)-like a model equation for polyatomic vapors that have previously been shown to produce accurate solutions to the Boltzmann transport equation. We observe that the Schrage equation overpredicts heat/mass fluxes by ∼15% for fluids with accommodation coefficients close to unity. For fluids with smaller accommodation coefficients, such as water, the Schrage equation yields more accurate flux estimates. We find that the Mott-Smith-like moment methods developed for liquid–vapor phase change are much more accurate than the Schrage equation, achieving heat/mass flux estimates that deviate by less than 1% (evaporation) and 4% (condensation) from the reference solution. In light of these results, we recommend using the moment method equations instead of the Schrage equation. We also provide tables with our high-accuracy numerical data for evaporation of any fluid and condensation of saturated water vapor, engineering equations fit our data, and code for moment method calculations of evaporation and condensation.
    • Download: (4.391Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Revisiting the Schrage Equation for Kinetically Limited Evaporation and Condensation

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4287190
    Collections
    • Journal of Heat Transfer

    Show full item record

    contributor authorVaartstra
    contributor authorGeoffrey;Lu
    contributor authorZhengmao;Lienhard
    contributor authorJohn H.;Wang
    contributor authorEvelyn N.
    date accessioned2022-08-18T12:58:14Z
    date available2022-08-18T12:58:14Z
    date copyright5/24/2022 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2022
    identifier issn0022-1481
    identifier otherht_144_08_080802.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4287190
    description abstractThe Schrage equation is commonly used in thermofluid engineering to model high-rate liquid–vapor phase change of pure fluids. Although shortcomings of this simple model were pointed out decades ago and more rigorous models have emerged from the kinetic theory community, Schrage's equation continues to be widely used. In this paper, we quantify the accuracy of the Schrage equation for evaporation and condensation of monatomic and polyatomic fluids at the low to moderately high flux operating conditions relevant to thermofluid engineering applications. As a high-accuracy reference, we numerically solve a Bhatnagar, Gross, and Krook (BGK)-like a model equation for polyatomic vapors that have previously been shown to produce accurate solutions to the Boltzmann transport equation. We observe that the Schrage equation overpredicts heat/mass fluxes by ∼15% for fluids with accommodation coefficients close to unity. For fluids with smaller accommodation coefficients, such as water, the Schrage equation yields more accurate flux estimates. We find that the Mott-Smith-like moment methods developed for liquid–vapor phase change are much more accurate than the Schrage equation, achieving heat/mass flux estimates that deviate by less than 1% (evaporation) and 4% (condensation) from the reference solution. In light of these results, we recommend using the moment method equations instead of the Schrage equation. We also provide tables with our high-accuracy numerical data for evaporation of any fluid and condensation of saturated water vapor, engineering equations fit our data, and code for moment method calculations of evaporation and condensation.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleRevisiting the Schrage Equation for Kinetically Limited Evaporation and Condensation
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume144
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Heat Transfer
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4054382
    journal fristpage80802-1
    journal lastpage80802-21
    page21
    treeJournal of Heat Transfer:;2022:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian