YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Validation of a Two-Phase CFD Air/Mist Film Cooling Model With Experimental Details—Part II: Computational Model Validation

    Source: Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications:;2022:;volume( 014 ):;issue: 011::page 111010-1
    Author:
    Abdelmaksoud
    ,
    Ramy;Wang
    ,
    Ting;Zhao
    ,
    Lei
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4054625
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: In this Part II of the paper, a numerical study has been performed to validate the multiphase computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model by comparing its results to the experimental data of an air/mist film cooling study presented in Part I. The complete experimental test section was simulated including all the details such as five holes, side walls effect, partially opened top wall, the conjugate bottom wall, the initial droplet distributions from the actual data, and the long boundary layer developing region upstream of the cooling holes. The effects of different particle distributions, the breakup and coalescence models, and the conjugate wall on the adiabatic film cooling effectiveness were investigated. The multiphase CFD model employs an Eulerian–Lagrangian approach. The Eulerian method is used for the continuous phase including air and water vapor, and the Lagrangian method in terms of the discrete phase model (DPM) is used to simulate the dispersed phase of liquid droplets in a continuous phase of air–water vapor mixture. The overall consistency between the computational prediction and experimental data is within 0.2% for the air-only case and 7% for the mist case. The results showed that considering the wall using the conjugate heat transfer technique significantly provided better agreement with the experimental data than without including the wall. The non-uniform particle distribution provided better agreement with the experimental results near the film cooling hole exit.
    • Download: (1.384Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Validation of a Two-Phase CFD Air/Mist Film Cooling Model With Experimental Details—Part II: Computational Model Validation

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4286939
    Collections
    • Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAbdelmaksoud
    contributor authorRamy;Wang
    contributor authorTing;Zhao
    contributor authorLei
    date accessioned2022-08-18T12:50:00Z
    date available2022-08-18T12:50:00Z
    date copyright6/15/2022 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2022
    identifier issn1948-5085
    identifier othertsea_14_11_111010.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4286939
    description abstractIn this Part II of the paper, a numerical study has been performed to validate the multiphase computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model by comparing its results to the experimental data of an air/mist film cooling study presented in Part I. The complete experimental test section was simulated including all the details such as five holes, side walls effect, partially opened top wall, the conjugate bottom wall, the initial droplet distributions from the actual data, and the long boundary layer developing region upstream of the cooling holes. The effects of different particle distributions, the breakup and coalescence models, and the conjugate wall on the adiabatic film cooling effectiveness were investigated. The multiphase CFD model employs an Eulerian–Lagrangian approach. The Eulerian method is used for the continuous phase including air and water vapor, and the Lagrangian method in terms of the discrete phase model (DPM) is used to simulate the dispersed phase of liquid droplets in a continuous phase of air–water vapor mixture. The overall consistency between the computational prediction and experimental data is within 0.2% for the air-only case and 7% for the mist case. The results showed that considering the wall using the conjugate heat transfer technique significantly provided better agreement with the experimental data than without including the wall. The non-uniform particle distribution provided better agreement with the experimental results near the film cooling hole exit.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleValidation of a Two-Phase CFD Air/Mist Film Cooling Model With Experimental Details—Part II: Computational Model Validation
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume14
    journal issue11
    journal titleJournal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4054625
    journal fristpage111010-1
    journal lastpage111010-11
    page11
    treeJournal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications:;2022:;volume( 014 ):;issue: 011
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian