YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Evaluation of Pulsating Pressure and Emitter Position in Preventing Drip Emitters from Clogging

    Source: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 148 ):;issue: 003::page 06021015
    Author:
    Caio Nascimento Fernandes
    ,
    João Carlos Cury Saad
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001658
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Non–pressure compensating (Non-PC) emitters are employed mainly in drip irrigation systems due to their structural simplicity and low manufacturing costs; however, they present high sensitivity to physical obstruction, even when using filtration. This research aimed to analyze the effects of pulsating pressure, constant pressure, and water exit position in terms of preventing clogging in Non-PC drippers with a labyrinth system. The tests were performed on a test bench, and each treatment had 68 drippers (repetitions). Quartz sand was added to the irrigation water at a 500  mg L−1 concentration in two granulometric ranges (53–105 and 250–500 μm) to reproduce field conditions. The performance indicators were emitter flow rate (L h−1) and relative flow rate (qr). For the 250–500 μm granulometric range and the emitters positioned with the water exit facing downward, the 30 s constant pressure and 1 min pulsating pressure resulted in the obstruction of all emitters with only 2 h of operation. In the 53–105 μm granulometric range with the emitter hole facing downward, a pulsating pressure with a 1 min cycle was the most efficient at delaying emitter clogging, showing qr>75% during the first 16 h of operation. When the dripper exit was positioned facing upward in the most critical situation (constant pressure), no clogging was observed within the two granulometric ranges during the 40 h test. For this emitter model, which is widely applied in horticulture, a water exit facing upward is recommended to prevent clogging by suspended solid particles.
    • Download: (895.9Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Evaluation of Pulsating Pressure and Emitter Position in Preventing Drip Emitters from Clogging

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4283787
    Collections
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorCaio Nascimento Fernandes
    contributor authorJoão Carlos Cury Saad
    date accessioned2022-05-07T21:29:11Z
    date available2022-05-07T21:29:11Z
    date issued2021-12-20
    identifier other(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001658.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4283787
    description abstractNon–pressure compensating (Non-PC) emitters are employed mainly in drip irrigation systems due to their structural simplicity and low manufacturing costs; however, they present high sensitivity to physical obstruction, even when using filtration. This research aimed to analyze the effects of pulsating pressure, constant pressure, and water exit position in terms of preventing clogging in Non-PC drippers with a labyrinth system. The tests were performed on a test bench, and each treatment had 68 drippers (repetitions). Quartz sand was added to the irrigation water at a 500  mg L−1 concentration in two granulometric ranges (53–105 and 250–500 μm) to reproduce field conditions. The performance indicators were emitter flow rate (L h−1) and relative flow rate (qr). For the 250–500 μm granulometric range and the emitters positioned with the water exit facing downward, the 30 s constant pressure and 1 min pulsating pressure resulted in the obstruction of all emitters with only 2 h of operation. In the 53–105 μm granulometric range with the emitter hole facing downward, a pulsating pressure with a 1 min cycle was the most efficient at delaying emitter clogging, showing qr>75% during the first 16 h of operation. When the dripper exit was positioned facing upward in the most critical situation (constant pressure), no clogging was observed within the two granulometric ranges during the 40 h test. For this emitter model, which is widely applied in horticulture, a water exit facing upward is recommended to prevent clogging by suspended solid particles.
    publisherASCE
    titleEvaluation of Pulsating Pressure and Emitter Position in Preventing Drip Emitters from Clogging
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume148
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001658
    journal fristpage06021015
    journal lastpage06021015-5
    page5
    treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 148 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian