YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Multicriterial Analysis for the Identification of Key Areas to Improve the Management in Piracicaba River Basin, Brazil

    Source: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 027 ):;issue: 001::page 05021033
    Author:
    Tárcio Rocha Lopes
    ,
    Marcos Vinicius Folegatti
    ,
    Cornélio Alberto Zolin
    ,
    Larissa Brêtas Moura
    ,
    Rubmara Ketzer Oliveira
    ,
    Luciano Sobral Fraga
    ,
    Sérgio Nascimento Duarte
    ,
    Otávio Neto Almeida Santos
    ,
    Claudia Moster
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002146
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: The objective of the study was to identify areas subject to the implementation of payment for hydrological environmental services projects, aiming to provide solutions for planners and decision makers. Multicriterial analysis (MCA) was used, with the integration of criteria that were aggregated through methods called ordered weighted averaging (OWA) and weighted linear combination (WLC). The alternatives WLC and OWA medium-to-low risk-taking were viable solutions to identify areas with potential for improving water availability, identifying and combining areas with high surface runoff, low soil water storage, high soil loss, low concentration time, and close to rivers. The same alternatives were good solutions to identify areas with potential for improving water quality, pointing out priority areas with a high concentration of nitrogen, high surface runoff, and soil loss. For the areas with potential to erosion control and sediment production, the alternatives WLC and OWA medium-to-high risk-taking proved to be good solutions, indicating areas that coincide with high soil loss, high surface runoff, high slope, and close to rivers. With the established MCA procedures, it is possible to use the same criteria, weights, and methods used to define key areas for the qualification of decision-making and management processes, especially in matters involving instruments and measures for the conservation of watersheds.
    • Download: (8.142Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Multicriterial Analysis for the Identification of Key Areas to Improve the Management in Piracicaba River Basin, Brazil

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4283643
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorTárcio Rocha Lopes
    contributor authorMarcos Vinicius Folegatti
    contributor authorCornélio Alberto Zolin
    contributor authorLarissa Brêtas Moura
    contributor authorRubmara Ketzer Oliveira
    contributor authorLuciano Sobral Fraga
    contributor authorSérgio Nascimento Duarte
    contributor authorOtávio Neto Almeida Santos
    contributor authorClaudia Moster
    date accessioned2022-05-07T21:22:15Z
    date available2022-05-07T21:22:15Z
    date issued2021-11-03
    identifier other(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002146.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4283643
    description abstractThe objective of the study was to identify areas subject to the implementation of payment for hydrological environmental services projects, aiming to provide solutions for planners and decision makers. Multicriterial analysis (MCA) was used, with the integration of criteria that were aggregated through methods called ordered weighted averaging (OWA) and weighted linear combination (WLC). The alternatives WLC and OWA medium-to-low risk-taking were viable solutions to identify areas with potential for improving water availability, identifying and combining areas with high surface runoff, low soil water storage, high soil loss, low concentration time, and close to rivers. The same alternatives were good solutions to identify areas with potential for improving water quality, pointing out priority areas with a high concentration of nitrogen, high surface runoff, and soil loss. For the areas with potential to erosion control and sediment production, the alternatives WLC and OWA medium-to-high risk-taking proved to be good solutions, indicating areas that coincide with high soil loss, high surface runoff, high slope, and close to rivers. With the established MCA procedures, it is possible to use the same criteria, weights, and methods used to define key areas for the qualification of decision-making and management processes, especially in matters involving instruments and measures for the conservation of watersheds.
    publisherASCE
    titleMulticriterial Analysis for the Identification of Key Areas to Improve the Management in Piracicaba River Basin, Brazil
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume27
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002146
    journal fristpage05021033
    journal lastpage05021033-22
    page22
    treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 027 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian