YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    PET Fiber–Reinforced Engineered Geopolymer and Cementitious Composites

    Source: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 034 ):;issue: 003::page 06021010
    Author:
    Sadaqat Ullah Khan
    ,
    Tehmina Ayub
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004215
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: In this investigation, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) fibers obtained from the plastic bottles were used in engineered cementitious and geopolymer composites (ECC and EGC). These composites were compared with polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and polypropylene (PP)–reinforced ECC and EGC. A total of eight mixtures (four for ECC and four for EGC) were prepared with 0% to 2% volume fraction of fibers. In each ECC and EGC series, one mixture was a control (without fibers) and a 2% volume fraction of PET, PVA, and PP fibers were added in the remaining three mixtures. The specimens prepared using these mixes were tested to failure under bending, compression, and direct tension to observe the multiple cracking and pseudo-strain-hardening (PSH) response associated with ECC. The flexural load–deflection response of fiber-reinforced ECC and EGC was observed and compared with the control mix without fibers. Besides mechanical properties, the field emission scanning electron microscopic (FESEM) images were also envisaged to observe the microstructure of the composites. It was found that the behavior of PET fiber–reinforced ECC and EGC in terms of mechanical properties was better among all combinations. PET fiber–reinforced ECC and EGC were also found competitive to PVA fiber–reinforced ECC and EGC in terms of strength and multiple cracking PSH response.
    • Download: (5.474Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      PET Fiber–Reinforced Engineered Geopolymer and Cementitious Composites

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4282093
    Collections
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSadaqat Ullah Khan
    contributor authorTehmina Ayub
    date accessioned2022-05-07T20:11:22Z
    date available2022-05-07T20:11:22Z
    date issued2021-12-24
    identifier other(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004215.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4282093
    description abstractIn this investigation, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) fibers obtained from the plastic bottles were used in engineered cementitious and geopolymer composites (ECC and EGC). These composites were compared with polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and polypropylene (PP)–reinforced ECC and EGC. A total of eight mixtures (four for ECC and four for EGC) were prepared with 0% to 2% volume fraction of fibers. In each ECC and EGC series, one mixture was a control (without fibers) and a 2% volume fraction of PET, PVA, and PP fibers were added in the remaining three mixtures. The specimens prepared using these mixes were tested to failure under bending, compression, and direct tension to observe the multiple cracking and pseudo-strain-hardening (PSH) response associated with ECC. The flexural load–deflection response of fiber-reinforced ECC and EGC was observed and compared with the control mix without fibers. Besides mechanical properties, the field emission scanning electron microscopic (FESEM) images were also envisaged to observe the microstructure of the composites. It was found that the behavior of PET fiber–reinforced ECC and EGC in terms of mechanical properties was better among all combinations. PET fiber–reinforced ECC and EGC were also found competitive to PVA fiber–reinforced ECC and EGC in terms of strength and multiple cracking PSH response.
    publisherASCE
    titlePET Fiber–Reinforced Engineered Geopolymer and Cementitious Composites
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume34
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004215
    journal fristpage06021010
    journal lastpage06021010-15
    page15
    treeJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 034 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian