YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Flow Regime Identification in Vertical Upward Gas–Liquid Flow Using an Optical Sensor With Linear and Quadratic Discriminant Analysis

    Source: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2020:;volume( 143 ):;issue: 002::page 021401-1
    Author:
    Sarkodie, Kwame
    ,
    Fergusson-Rees, Andrew
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4048613
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The accurate identification of gas–liquid flow regimes in pipes remains a challenge for the chemical process industries. This paper proposes a method for flow regime identification that combines responses from a nonintrusive optical sensor with linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) for vertical upward gas–liquid flow of air and water. A total of 165 flow conditions make up the dataset, collected from an experimental air–water flow loop with a transparent test section (TS) of 27.3 mm inner diameter and 5 m length. Selected features extracted from the sensor response are categorized into feature group 1, average sensor response and standard deviation, and feature group 2 that also includes percentage counts of the calibrated responses for water and air. The selected features are used to train, cross validate, and test four model cases (LDA1, LDA2, QDA1, and QDA2). The LDA models produce higher average test classification accuracies (both 95%) than the QDA models (80% QDA1 and 45% QDA2) due to misclassification associated with the slug and churn flow regimes. Results suggest that the LDA1 model case is the most stable with the lowest average performance loss and is therefore considered superior for flow regime identification. In future studies, a larger dataset may improve stability and accuracy of the QDA models, and an extension of the conditions and parameters would be a useful test of applicability.
    • Download: (3.189Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Flow Regime Identification in Vertical Upward Gas–Liquid Flow Using an Optical Sensor With Linear and Quadratic Discriminant Analysis

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4277194
    Collections
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSarkodie, Kwame
    contributor authorFergusson-Rees, Andrew
    date accessioned2022-02-05T22:14:37Z
    date available2022-02-05T22:14:37Z
    date copyright10/26/2020 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2020
    identifier issn0098-2202
    identifier otherfe_143_02_021401.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4277194
    description abstractThe accurate identification of gas–liquid flow regimes in pipes remains a challenge for the chemical process industries. This paper proposes a method for flow regime identification that combines responses from a nonintrusive optical sensor with linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) for vertical upward gas–liquid flow of air and water. A total of 165 flow conditions make up the dataset, collected from an experimental air–water flow loop with a transparent test section (TS) of 27.3 mm inner diameter and 5 m length. Selected features extracted from the sensor response are categorized into feature group 1, average sensor response and standard deviation, and feature group 2 that also includes percentage counts of the calibrated responses for water and air. The selected features are used to train, cross validate, and test four model cases (LDA1, LDA2, QDA1, and QDA2). The LDA models produce higher average test classification accuracies (both 95%) than the QDA models (80% QDA1 and 45% QDA2) due to misclassification associated with the slug and churn flow regimes. Results suggest that the LDA1 model case is the most stable with the lowest average performance loss and is therefore considered superior for flow regime identification. In future studies, a larger dataset may improve stability and accuracy of the QDA models, and an extension of the conditions and parameters would be a useful test of applicability.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleFlow Regime Identification in Vertical Upward Gas–Liquid Flow Using an Optical Sensor With Linear and Quadratic Discriminant Analysis
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume143
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4048613
    journal fristpage021401-1
    journal lastpage021401-12
    page12
    treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;2020:;volume( 143 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian