YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    The Inclusion of End-of-Life Modeling in the Life Cycle Energy Optimization Methodology

    Source: Journal of Mechanical Design:;2020:;volume( 143 ):;issue: 005::page 052002-1
    Author:
    Bouchouireb, Hamza
    ,
    Jank, Merle-Hendrikje
    ,
    O’Reilly, Ciarán J.
    ,
    Göransson, Peter
    ,
    Schöggl, Josef-Peter
    ,
    Baumgartner, Rupert J.
    ,
    Potting, José
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4048447
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: In this study, an end-of-life (EOL) model is included in the life cycle energy optimization (LCEO) methodology to account for the energy burdens and credits stemming from a vehicle’s EOL processing phase and balance them against the vehicle’s functional requirements and production and use-phase energies. The substitution with a correction factor allocation method is used to model the contribution of recycling to the EOL phase’s energy. The methodology is illustrated through the optimization of the design of a simplified vehicle subsystem. For the latter, multiple recycling scenarios with varying levels of assumed recycling induced material property degradation were built, and their impact on the vehicle subsystem’s optimal solutions was compared to that of scenarios based on landfilling and incineration with energy recovery. The results show that the vehicle subsystem’s optimal designs are significantly dependent on the EOL scenario considered. In particular, the optimal designs associated with the recycling scenarios are on average substantially heavier, and less life cycle energy demanding, than their landfilling or incineration with energy recovery-related counterparts, thus demonstrating how the inclusion of EOL modeling in the LCEO methodology can significantly alter material use patterns, thereby effecting the very mechanisms enabling the embodiment of the resulting life cycle energy optimal designs.
    • Download: (380.4Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      The Inclusion of End-of-Life Modeling in the Life Cycle Energy Optimization Methodology

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4276320
    Collections
    • Journal of Mechanical Design

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBouchouireb, Hamza
    contributor authorJank, Merle-Hendrikje
    contributor authorO’Reilly, Ciarán J.
    contributor authorGöransson, Peter
    contributor authorSchöggl, Josef-Peter
    contributor authorBaumgartner, Rupert J.
    contributor authorPotting, José
    date accessioned2022-02-05T21:46:42Z
    date available2022-02-05T21:46:42Z
    date copyright11/17/2020 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2020
    identifier issn1050-0472
    identifier othermd_143_5_052002.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4276320
    description abstractIn this study, an end-of-life (EOL) model is included in the life cycle energy optimization (LCEO) methodology to account for the energy burdens and credits stemming from a vehicle’s EOL processing phase and balance them against the vehicle’s functional requirements and production and use-phase energies. The substitution with a correction factor allocation method is used to model the contribution of recycling to the EOL phase’s energy. The methodology is illustrated through the optimization of the design of a simplified vehicle subsystem. For the latter, multiple recycling scenarios with varying levels of assumed recycling induced material property degradation were built, and their impact on the vehicle subsystem’s optimal solutions was compared to that of scenarios based on landfilling and incineration with energy recovery. The results show that the vehicle subsystem’s optimal designs are significantly dependent on the EOL scenario considered. In particular, the optimal designs associated with the recycling scenarios are on average substantially heavier, and less life cycle energy demanding, than their landfilling or incineration with energy recovery-related counterparts, thus demonstrating how the inclusion of EOL modeling in the LCEO methodology can significantly alter material use patterns, thereby effecting the very mechanisms enabling the embodiment of the resulting life cycle energy optimal designs.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleThe Inclusion of End-of-Life Modeling in the Life Cycle Energy Optimization Methodology
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume143
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4048447
    journal fristpage052002-1
    journal lastpage052002-12
    page12
    treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2020:;volume( 143 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian