YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Structural Stress Determination at a Hot-Spot

    Source: Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2020:;volume( 142 ):;issue: 004
    Author:
    Han, Goeun
    ,
    Guzey, Sukru
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4046216
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Stress analysis by a finite element analysis program sometimes causes singularities in hot-spots. In a failure assessment, the structural stress, and membrane and bending stress should be determined in a highly stressed spot (hot-spot). When the structural stress at a hot-spot is disturbed by singularities, the stress result not only diverges, by reducing the element size, but also shows a decreased value compared to nominal stress because the stress is substituted into the von Mises equivalent stress equation. In the three-dimensional (3D) finite element model, it is hard to avoid the singularity problem at hot-spots particularly when it is subjected to loads in three axial directions. For the alternative, this study converts the 3D model into two-dimensional (2D) plane models to remove the singularity and to obtain reasonable structural stress values excluding the peak stress. The structural stress-estimating approaches applied in the 2D model were examined for whether they could avoid the structural stress reduction near the hot-spot with mesh insensitivity. The implemented approaches are stress linearization, single point away method, stress equilibrium, stress extrapolation, and the nodal force method. The results computed by each approach are compared and reconstructed to 3D stress by the Cauchy stress matrix. This study found that the difference in structural stress in 2D was eliminated after the 3D stress reconstruction.
    • Download: (7.648Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Structural Stress Determination at a Hot-Spot

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4274214
    Collections
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorHan, Goeun
    contributor authorGuzey, Sukru
    date accessioned2022-02-04T14:42:42Z
    date available2022-02-04T14:42:42Z
    date copyright2020/03/18/
    date issued2020
    identifier issn0094-9930
    identifier otherpvt_142_04_041301.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4274214
    description abstractStress analysis by a finite element analysis program sometimes causes singularities in hot-spots. In a failure assessment, the structural stress, and membrane and bending stress should be determined in a highly stressed spot (hot-spot). When the structural stress at a hot-spot is disturbed by singularities, the stress result not only diverges, by reducing the element size, but also shows a decreased value compared to nominal stress because the stress is substituted into the von Mises equivalent stress equation. In the three-dimensional (3D) finite element model, it is hard to avoid the singularity problem at hot-spots particularly when it is subjected to loads in three axial directions. For the alternative, this study converts the 3D model into two-dimensional (2D) plane models to remove the singularity and to obtain reasonable structural stress values excluding the peak stress. The structural stress-estimating approaches applied in the 2D model were examined for whether they could avoid the structural stress reduction near the hot-spot with mesh insensitivity. The implemented approaches are stress linearization, single point away method, stress equilibrium, stress extrapolation, and the nodal force method. The results computed by each approach are compared and reconstructed to 3D stress by the Cauchy stress matrix. This study found that the difference in structural stress in 2D was eliminated after the 3D stress reconstruction.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleStructural Stress Determination at a Hot-Spot
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume142
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4046216
    page41301
    treeJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2020:;volume( 142 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian