YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Evaluating Water Damage in Acrylic Polymer–Modified Cold Bituminous Emulsion Mixtures

    Source: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 033 ):;issue: 012::page 04021337-1
    Author:
    Muna Al-Kafaji
    ,
    Shakir Al-Busaltan
    ,
    Hussein A. Ewadh
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003969
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Currently, there is a global increase in the use of sustainable technologies in the construction of pavement systems. Cold bituminous emulsion mixture (CBEM) is a promising alternative to hot mix asphalt (HMA) that offers economic, environmental, and energy-saving advantages. However, CBEMs have high water content because of the requirement for prewetting water, in addition to water within the bitumen emulsion. This additional water content causes low early strength and reduces resistance to water damage. To address this, the current study aims to evaluate the influence of water on CBEMs which have been modified with ordinary portland cement (OPC) and an acrylic (AR) polymer, evaluating them in comparison with HMAs. Marshall stability and durability, assessed by means of water damage tests, will thus be used to evaluate the influence of water content for each mix. The acrylic polymer was incorporated into the bitumen emulsion prior to the preparation of CBEMs at various percentages ranging from 0% to 5% of residual bitumen weight. The results indicate that the introduction of OPC and AR generally improves water damage resistance. The CBEM with a mix of OPC and 1.25% AR gave the best performance, showing a 12% increase in resistance compared with HMA with conventional mineral filler (CMF) and a striking 109% increase in resistance compared with CBEM with OPC only.
    • Download: (2.571Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Evaluating Water Damage in Acrylic Polymer–Modified Cold Bituminous Emulsion Mixtures

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4272628
    Collections
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMuna Al-Kafaji
    contributor authorShakir Al-Busaltan
    contributor authorHussein A. Ewadh
    date accessioned2022-02-01T22:06:31Z
    date available2022-02-01T22:06:31Z
    date issued12/1/2021
    identifier other%28ASCE%29MT.1943-5533.0003969.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4272628
    description abstractCurrently, there is a global increase in the use of sustainable technologies in the construction of pavement systems. Cold bituminous emulsion mixture (CBEM) is a promising alternative to hot mix asphalt (HMA) that offers economic, environmental, and energy-saving advantages. However, CBEMs have high water content because of the requirement for prewetting water, in addition to water within the bitumen emulsion. This additional water content causes low early strength and reduces resistance to water damage. To address this, the current study aims to evaluate the influence of water on CBEMs which have been modified with ordinary portland cement (OPC) and an acrylic (AR) polymer, evaluating them in comparison with HMAs. Marshall stability and durability, assessed by means of water damage tests, will thus be used to evaluate the influence of water content for each mix. The acrylic polymer was incorporated into the bitumen emulsion prior to the preparation of CBEMs at various percentages ranging from 0% to 5% of residual bitumen weight. The results indicate that the introduction of OPC and AR generally improves water damage resistance. The CBEM with a mix of OPC and 1.25% AR gave the best performance, showing a 12% increase in resistance compared with HMA with conventional mineral filler (CMF) and a striking 109% increase in resistance compared with CBEM with OPC only.
    publisherASCE
    titleEvaluating Water Damage in Acrylic Polymer–Modified Cold Bituminous Emulsion Mixtures
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume33
    journal issue12
    journal titleJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003969
    journal fristpage04021337-1
    journal lastpage04021337-12
    page12
    treeJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 033 ):;issue: 012
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian