YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Use of a 3D Structured-Light Scanner to Determine Volume, Surface Area, and Shape of Aggregates

    Source: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 033 ):;issue: 009::page 04021240-1
    Author:
    Paulo H. F. Loz
    ,
    Sérgio C. Angulo
    ,
    Markus S. Rebmann
    ,
    Erol Tutumluer
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003824
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: The standard method of using a caliper to determine aggregate particle dimensions is not sufficient to describe the shape, texture, angularity, and volume of particles, and there is not a reference method to determine aggregate surface area. A three-dimensional (3D) structured-light scanner seems to be a viable and economical alternative with enough speed to obtain 3D data from hundreds of particles. This work used a 3D scanner to evaluate morphological properties of coarse aggregates and compared results with those from conventional techniques. Two types of aggregates (around 60 particles of each type) were scanned and manually measured by a single operator with a digital caliper using two different methodologies: (1) the minimum bounding box (MBB), and (2) a conventional standard test method (STD). The 3D structured-light scanner proved to be accurate for assessing the morphology, surface area, and volume of coarse aggregates, and with a processing rate of 10  min/particle, it was faster than other techniques such as X-ray computed microtomography (micro-CT) or laser scanning. Compared with the manual method (caliper) or the most commonly used two-dimensional (2D) image analysis techniques, it also was more accurate. The MBB using a caliper overestimated volume by about 17% and underestimated surface area by 11%, which was estimated by assuming an ellipsoid with the dimensions obtained. The 2D circularity had a poor correlation with the 3D sphericity, especially for flat or elongated particles.
    • Download: (3.601Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Use of a 3D Structured-Light Scanner to Determine Volume, Surface Area, and Shape of Aggregates

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4272494
    Collections
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorPaulo H. F. Loz
    contributor authorSérgio C. Angulo
    contributor authorMarkus S. Rebmann
    contributor authorErol Tutumluer
    date accessioned2022-02-01T22:02:16Z
    date available2022-02-01T22:02:16Z
    date issued9/1/2021
    identifier other%28ASCE%29MT.1943-5533.0003824.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4272494
    description abstractThe standard method of using a caliper to determine aggregate particle dimensions is not sufficient to describe the shape, texture, angularity, and volume of particles, and there is not a reference method to determine aggregate surface area. A three-dimensional (3D) structured-light scanner seems to be a viable and economical alternative with enough speed to obtain 3D data from hundreds of particles. This work used a 3D scanner to evaluate morphological properties of coarse aggregates and compared results with those from conventional techniques. Two types of aggregates (around 60 particles of each type) were scanned and manually measured by a single operator with a digital caliper using two different methodologies: (1) the minimum bounding box (MBB), and (2) a conventional standard test method (STD). The 3D structured-light scanner proved to be accurate for assessing the morphology, surface area, and volume of coarse aggregates, and with a processing rate of 10  min/particle, it was faster than other techniques such as X-ray computed microtomography (micro-CT) or laser scanning. Compared with the manual method (caliper) or the most commonly used two-dimensional (2D) image analysis techniques, it also was more accurate. The MBB using a caliper overestimated volume by about 17% and underestimated surface area by 11%, which was estimated by assuming an ellipsoid with the dimensions obtained. The 2D circularity had a poor correlation with the 3D sphericity, especially for flat or elongated particles.
    publisherASCE
    titleUse of a 3D Structured-Light Scanner to Determine Volume, Surface Area, and Shape of Aggregates
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume33
    journal issue9
    journal titleJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003824
    journal fristpage04021240-1
    journal lastpage04021240-13
    page13
    treeJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 033 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian