YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Using Conditional Random Fields for a Spatially Variable Liquefiable Foundation Layer in Nonlinear Dynamic Analyses of Embankments

    Source: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 147 ):;issue: 011::page 04021134-1
    Author:
    Nicholas A. Paull
    ,
    Ross W. Boulanger
    ,
    Jason T. DeJong
    ,
    Steven J. Friesen
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002610
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Two-dimensional nonlinear dynamic analyses (NDAs) are performed for a series of hypothetical embankment dams on a spatially variable liquefiable foundation layer to evaluate the utility of representing the foundation layer with random fields conditioned on different levels of site characterization information. A set of two-dimensional parent models (PMs), each representing a true foundation condition, were generated using unconditional random fields of equivalent clean sand, corrected standard penetration test (N1)60cs values. Different levels of site characterization were then represented by combining different numbers of local borings (i.e., columns of data from the PM) with the optional inclusion of constraints on the geostatistical properties that might come from sitewide explorations. NDAs were performed using the same input motions for the PM (which represents perfect knowledge of soil conditions), a set of realizations conditioned on the local borings alone, and a set of realizations conditioned on the local borings with sitewide statistics. Embankment deformations obtained for the conditional realizations are compared to those for the PM to evaluate the potential benefits of increasing levels of site characterization in terms of deformation prediction accuracy. Parametric analyses include varying the embankment size, scales of fluctuation in the foundation stratum, number of conditioning borings, and ground motions. The results of these comparisons illustrate that the beneficial effects of using conditional random fields were generally limited to cases with the horizontal scale of fluctuation approaching the scale of the embankment base width and to cases with a large number of borings (more than three borings per horizontal scale of fluctuation), which may not be practical in many situations. Additional potential benefits and limitations of using conditional random fields for representing spatial variable liquefiable foundation layers in embankment dam NDAs are discussed.
    • Download: (11.57Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Using Conditional Random Fields for a Spatially Variable Liquefiable Foundation Layer in Nonlinear Dynamic Analyses of Embankments

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4272301
    Collections
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorNicholas A. Paull
    contributor authorRoss W. Boulanger
    contributor authorJason T. DeJong
    contributor authorSteven J. Friesen
    date accessioned2022-02-01T21:55:36Z
    date available2022-02-01T21:55:36Z
    date issued11/1/2021
    identifier other%28ASCE%29GT.1943-5606.0002610.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4272301
    description abstractTwo-dimensional nonlinear dynamic analyses (NDAs) are performed for a series of hypothetical embankment dams on a spatially variable liquefiable foundation layer to evaluate the utility of representing the foundation layer with random fields conditioned on different levels of site characterization information. A set of two-dimensional parent models (PMs), each representing a true foundation condition, were generated using unconditional random fields of equivalent clean sand, corrected standard penetration test (N1)60cs values. Different levels of site characterization were then represented by combining different numbers of local borings (i.e., columns of data from the PM) with the optional inclusion of constraints on the geostatistical properties that might come from sitewide explorations. NDAs were performed using the same input motions for the PM (which represents perfect knowledge of soil conditions), a set of realizations conditioned on the local borings alone, and a set of realizations conditioned on the local borings with sitewide statistics. Embankment deformations obtained for the conditional realizations are compared to those for the PM to evaluate the potential benefits of increasing levels of site characterization in terms of deformation prediction accuracy. Parametric analyses include varying the embankment size, scales of fluctuation in the foundation stratum, number of conditioning borings, and ground motions. The results of these comparisons illustrate that the beneficial effects of using conditional random fields were generally limited to cases with the horizontal scale of fluctuation approaching the scale of the embankment base width and to cases with a large number of borings (more than three borings per horizontal scale of fluctuation), which may not be practical in many situations. Additional potential benefits and limitations of using conditional random fields for representing spatial variable liquefiable foundation layers in embankment dam NDAs are discussed.
    publisherASCE
    titleUsing Conditional Random Fields for a Spatially Variable Liquefiable Foundation Layer in Nonlinear Dynamic Analyses of Embankments
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume147
    journal issue11
    journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002610
    journal fristpage04021134-1
    journal lastpage04021134-14
    page14
    treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 147 ):;issue: 011
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian