YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Quantifying Water Fluxes of Irrigated Fields in an Agricultural Watershed in Oklahoma

    Source: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 147 ):;issue: 007::page 04021026-1
    Author:
    Sumon Datta
    ,
    Mukesh Mehata
    ,
    Saleh Taghvaeian
    ,
    Daniel Moriasi
    ,
    Patrick J. Starks
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001570
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Evaluating the adequacy and efficiency of irrigation practices and identifying potential irrigation management improvements in agricultural watersheds require accurate estimates of water fluxes under actual management conditions. Such estimates are also beneficial for other applications, such as simulating physiological and hydrologic processes at field and basin scales. A three-year study was conducted at an agricultural watershed in west-central Oklahoma to quantify water fluxes and to compare the actual fluxes with those calculated assuming well-watered conditions. Measured applied irrigation data revealed that almost all studied fields were under-irrigated, with an average amount that was only 30% of what should have been applied to maintain well-watered (no stress) conditions. Other water fluxes, namely crop evapotranspiration (ET), runoff (RO), and deep percolation (DP), were estimated using two models with different levels of complexity: the root zone soil water balance (SWB) and the HYDRUS models. The outputs of the two models were close (normalized root mean square difference of 5% and 3% under actual and well-watered conditions, respectively) and showed that the common under-irrigation practices lead to a reduction in all fluxes compared to the hypothetical well-watered conditions. According to the HYDRUS model results, the average actual ET, RO, and DP fluxes were 82%, 50%, and 33% of what would have been experienced under well-watered conditions. The soil water content simulations of HYDRUS under the actual scenario were similar to readings of in-situ sensors installed at four depths at each study site with an overall root mean square difference of 0.06  cm3  cm−3. The findings of this study demonstrate that differences between actual fluxes and those calculated based on no water stress assumptions could be notable, leading to major errors if well-watered fluxes are used in crop growth models, hydrologic simulations, irrigation energy use and emission models, and other applications.
    • Download: (1.410Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Quantifying Water Fluxes of Irrigated Fields in an Agricultural Watershed in Oklahoma

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4271737
    Collections
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSumon Datta
    contributor authorMukesh Mehata
    contributor authorSaleh Taghvaeian
    contributor authorDaniel Moriasi
    contributor authorPatrick J. Starks
    date accessioned2022-02-01T00:36:37Z
    date available2022-02-01T00:36:37Z
    date issued7/1/2021
    identifier other%28ASCE%29IR.1943-4774.0001570.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4271737
    description abstractEvaluating the adequacy and efficiency of irrigation practices and identifying potential irrigation management improvements in agricultural watersheds require accurate estimates of water fluxes under actual management conditions. Such estimates are also beneficial for other applications, such as simulating physiological and hydrologic processes at field and basin scales. A three-year study was conducted at an agricultural watershed in west-central Oklahoma to quantify water fluxes and to compare the actual fluxes with those calculated assuming well-watered conditions. Measured applied irrigation data revealed that almost all studied fields were under-irrigated, with an average amount that was only 30% of what should have been applied to maintain well-watered (no stress) conditions. Other water fluxes, namely crop evapotranspiration (ET), runoff (RO), and deep percolation (DP), were estimated using two models with different levels of complexity: the root zone soil water balance (SWB) and the HYDRUS models. The outputs of the two models were close (normalized root mean square difference of 5% and 3% under actual and well-watered conditions, respectively) and showed that the common under-irrigation practices lead to a reduction in all fluxes compared to the hypothetical well-watered conditions. According to the HYDRUS model results, the average actual ET, RO, and DP fluxes were 82%, 50%, and 33% of what would have been experienced under well-watered conditions. The soil water content simulations of HYDRUS under the actual scenario were similar to readings of in-situ sensors installed at four depths at each study site with an overall root mean square difference of 0.06  cm3  cm−3. The findings of this study demonstrate that differences between actual fluxes and those calculated based on no water stress assumptions could be notable, leading to major errors if well-watered fluxes are used in crop growth models, hydrologic simulations, irrigation energy use and emission models, and other applications.
    publisherASCE
    titleQuantifying Water Fluxes of Irrigated Fields in an Agricultural Watershed in Oklahoma
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume147
    journal issue7
    journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001570
    journal fristpage04021026-1
    journal lastpage04021026-11
    page11
    treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 147 ):;issue: 007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian