YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Dam-Break Modeling: LBM as the Way towards Fully 3D, Large-Scale Applications

    Source: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 147 ):;issue: 005::page 04021017-1
    Author:
    Stefano Miliani
    ,
    Andrea Montessori
    ,
    Michele La Rocca
    ,
    Pietro Prestininzi
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001879
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Free-surface flows play an important role in many environmental hydraulic problems. Owing to their characteristic large spatial and temporal scales, reduced complexity models, such as depth-integrated shallow water (DI-SW) models, have so far been largely preferred to three-dimensional (3D) approaches. Even if they can reproduce water levels satisfactorily, DI-SW models do not natively provide flow velocity at the bed, which is pivotal for estimating scour effects induced by impulsive flows, such as those resulting from dam breaks. However, resort to fully 3D modeling is often impractical due to the high computational demand required; nonetheless, recent works have shown impressive performance of the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) compared to classical numerical methods while proving to be as accurate in many fields, suggesting LBM makes such computations affordable on desktop computers. So far, a comprehensive assessment of a LBM-based, fully 3D, free-surface model is still lacking. In this work, a LBM model is compared to data from a large series of dam-break-flow experiments, in terms of water levels and, where available, flow velocities. Comparisons with available DI-SW models are also carried out. Results show that the LBM model can correctly simulate both water levels and velocity distributions, the latter often being inaccurately reproduced by DI-SW models. To provide guidelines for the correct modeling of such flows, considerations are also given to opportunities to use either no-slip or free-slip boundary conditions, the latter being preferable if underresolved boundary layers are present.
    • Download: (1.142Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Dam-Break Modeling: LBM as the Way towards Fully 3D, Large-Scale Applications

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4271646
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorStefano Miliani
    contributor authorAndrea Montessori
    contributor authorMichele La Rocca
    contributor authorPietro Prestininzi
    date accessioned2022-02-01T00:33:36Z
    date available2022-02-01T00:33:36Z
    date issued5/1/2021
    identifier other%28ASCE%29HY.1943-7900.0001879.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4271646
    description abstractFree-surface flows play an important role in many environmental hydraulic problems. Owing to their characteristic large spatial and temporal scales, reduced complexity models, such as depth-integrated shallow water (DI-SW) models, have so far been largely preferred to three-dimensional (3D) approaches. Even if they can reproduce water levels satisfactorily, DI-SW models do not natively provide flow velocity at the bed, which is pivotal for estimating scour effects induced by impulsive flows, such as those resulting from dam breaks. However, resort to fully 3D modeling is often impractical due to the high computational demand required; nonetheless, recent works have shown impressive performance of the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) compared to classical numerical methods while proving to be as accurate in many fields, suggesting LBM makes such computations affordable on desktop computers. So far, a comprehensive assessment of a LBM-based, fully 3D, free-surface model is still lacking. In this work, a LBM model is compared to data from a large series of dam-break-flow experiments, in terms of water levels and, where available, flow velocities. Comparisons with available DI-SW models are also carried out. Results show that the LBM model can correctly simulate both water levels and velocity distributions, the latter often being inaccurately reproduced by DI-SW models. To provide guidelines for the correct modeling of such flows, considerations are also given to opportunities to use either no-slip or free-slip boundary conditions, the latter being preferable if underresolved boundary layers are present.
    publisherASCE
    titleDam-Break Modeling: LBM as the Way towards Fully 3D, Large-Scale Applications
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume147
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Hydraulic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001879
    journal fristpage04021017-1
    journal lastpage04021017-17
    page17
    treeJournal of Hydraulic Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 147 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian