YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Measuring Progress and Productivity in Model-Driven Engineering for Capital Project Delivery

    Source: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2021:;Volume ( 147 ):;issue: 004::page 04021009-1
    Author:
    Gustavo Garcia
    ,
    Mani Golparvar-Fard
    ,
    Jesus M. de la Garza
    ,
    Martin Fischer
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001969
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: A key underlying challenge in today’s model-driven approach to engineering is how progress and level of effort are being measured and reported. Recent definitions such as level of development enable project teams to track completeness of information in building information modeling (BIM)-driven processes; yet, there are no established processes or metrics to reliably measure progress or track productivity of a model-driven engineering process as a function of the maturity of the model and/or the data that supports the engineering process. To address this gap in knowledge, this paper presents a discrete set of model maturity index (MMI) definitions to measure progress in engineering work, per modeling discipline. Using these MMI definitions, a model maturity risk index (Model MRI) toolkit was created to track maturity of an engineering process at the granularity of work breakdown structure locations. The MMI toolkit also reports risk in achieving certain MMI levels per modeling discipline. To benchmark maturity of the modeling work per project milestone or model review session and to establish workflows for tracking progress, an addendum to the modeling execution plan (ModelXP) is presented. New productivity and project controls metrics for tracking modeling work are also introduced. The developed definitions, toolkit, and addendum to ModelXP were validated through exhaustive surveys and charrette tests with project stakeholders involved in capital projects. The role of the MMI definitions and Model MRI toolkit in providing project controls insight and proactive management opportunities in real-world projects is discussed in detail.
    • Download: (3.478Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Measuring Progress and Productivity in Model-Driven Engineering for Capital Project Delivery

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4270958
    Collections
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorGustavo Garcia
    contributor authorMani Golparvar-Fard
    contributor authorJesus M. de la Garza
    contributor authorMartin Fischer
    date accessioned2022-02-01T00:07:41Z
    date available2022-02-01T00:07:41Z
    date issued4/1/2021
    identifier other%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0001969.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4270958
    description abstractA key underlying challenge in today’s model-driven approach to engineering is how progress and level of effort are being measured and reported. Recent definitions such as level of development enable project teams to track completeness of information in building information modeling (BIM)-driven processes; yet, there are no established processes or metrics to reliably measure progress or track productivity of a model-driven engineering process as a function of the maturity of the model and/or the data that supports the engineering process. To address this gap in knowledge, this paper presents a discrete set of model maturity index (MMI) definitions to measure progress in engineering work, per modeling discipline. Using these MMI definitions, a model maturity risk index (Model MRI) toolkit was created to track maturity of an engineering process at the granularity of work breakdown structure locations. The MMI toolkit also reports risk in achieving certain MMI levels per modeling discipline. To benchmark maturity of the modeling work per project milestone or model review session and to establish workflows for tracking progress, an addendum to the modeling execution plan (ModelXP) is presented. New productivity and project controls metrics for tracking modeling work are also introduced. The developed definitions, toolkit, and addendum to ModelXP were validated through exhaustive surveys and charrette tests with project stakeholders involved in capital projects. The role of the MMI definitions and Model MRI toolkit in providing project controls insight and proactive management opportunities in real-world projects is discussed in detail.
    publisherASCE
    titleMeasuring Progress and Productivity in Model-Driven Engineering for Capital Project Delivery
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume147
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001969
    journal fristpage04021009-1
    journal lastpage04021009-13
    page13
    treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2021:;Volume ( 147 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian