YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Cold Regions Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Cold Regions Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Field Testing and Cost–Benefit Evaluation of Corrosion-Protective Coatings on Winter Maintenance Equipment in the State of Ohio

    Source: Journal of Cold Regions Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 035 ):;issue: 001::page 04020031
    Author:
    Alvaro A. Rodriguez
    ,
    Christopher M. Miller
    ,
    Chelsea N. Monty
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CR.1943-5495.0000239
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Although current estimates suggest that the United States corrosion costs reach more than $500 billion dollars each year, the adoption of corrosion-control practices will reduce these costs by 15%–35%. In fact, the annual cost of corrosion in the automotive industry in the United States alone is estimated to be $30 billion. Implementation of effective corrosion prevention strategies by departments of transportation during the winter season will increase public safety by preventing unexpected snow and ice equipment failures, decrease downtime, and provide cost savings through reduction in rust-related maintenance. Protective coatings could increase equipment lifetime and decrease maintenance costs; however, there is limited performance data to show the effectiveness of these corrosion-mitigation strategies. In this work, laboratory and in-field testing were used in combination with cost–benefit analysis to identify cost-effective, field-tested coating systems. Based on these results, a standard operating procedure for coating equipment was developed proposing the addition of any of the studied top-performing protective coatings, polyurethane coating (PC1) and UV-cured coating (UVC), to any newly assembled dump truck.
    • Download: (682.5Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Field Testing and Cost–Benefit Evaluation of Corrosion-Protective Coatings on Winter Maintenance Equipment in the State of Ohio

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4269197
    Collections
    • Journal of Cold Regions Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAlvaro A. Rodriguez
    contributor authorChristopher M. Miller
    contributor authorChelsea N. Monty
    date accessioned2022-01-30T22:34:35Z
    date available2022-01-30T22:34:35Z
    date issued3/1/2021
    identifier other(ASCE)CR.1943-5495.0000239.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4269197
    description abstractAlthough current estimates suggest that the United States corrosion costs reach more than $500 billion dollars each year, the adoption of corrosion-control practices will reduce these costs by 15%–35%. In fact, the annual cost of corrosion in the automotive industry in the United States alone is estimated to be $30 billion. Implementation of effective corrosion prevention strategies by departments of transportation during the winter season will increase public safety by preventing unexpected snow and ice equipment failures, decrease downtime, and provide cost savings through reduction in rust-related maintenance. Protective coatings could increase equipment lifetime and decrease maintenance costs; however, there is limited performance data to show the effectiveness of these corrosion-mitigation strategies. In this work, laboratory and in-field testing were used in combination with cost–benefit analysis to identify cost-effective, field-tested coating systems. Based on these results, a standard operating procedure for coating equipment was developed proposing the addition of any of the studied top-performing protective coatings, polyurethane coating (PC1) and UV-cured coating (UVC), to any newly assembled dump truck.
    publisherASCE
    titleField Testing and Cost–Benefit Evaluation of Corrosion-Protective Coatings on Winter Maintenance Equipment in the State of Ohio
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume35
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Cold Regions Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CR.1943-5495.0000239
    journal fristpage04020031
    journal lastpage04020031-11
    page11
    treeJournal of Cold Regions Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 035 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian