YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Applicability of Lumped Hydrological Models in a Data-Constrained River Basin of Asia

    Source: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 025 ):;issue: 008
    Author:
    Uttam Ghimire
    ,
    Anshul Agarwal
    ,
    Narayan Kumar Shrestha
    ,
    Prasad Daggupati
    ,
    Govindarajalu Srinivasan
    ,
    Htay Htay Than
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001950
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: A representative of meteorological data-constrained basin, Ayeyarwady, in Myanmar, Southeast Asia, is set for flow simulation and forecasting at 15 locations using a range of hydrological modeling approaches: conceptual lumped (GR4J), hybrid-lumped [Identification of unit Hydrographs And Component flows from Rainfall Evapotranspiration and Streamflow Catchment Wetness Index (IHACRES CWI)], semidistributed [Hydrological Engineering Center-Hydrological Modeling System (HEC-HMS)], and relatively distributed [Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT)]. Using daily rainfall data from 51 surface rainfall stations (over an area of approximately 400,000  km2) and coarse monthly evaporation inputs from global sources, the models are calibrated (validated) against observed flows for 2001–2009 (2010–2014) using the performance indicators Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), percentage bias (PBIAS), RMSE-observations standard deviation ratio (RSR), and volumetric efficiency . The developed models were then integrated with rainfall forecasts from the Weather Research and Forecasting Model for 2015–2018 and assessed for biases against observed flows. The NSE values were favorable for GR4J (median NSE=0.9), followed by IHACRES (NSE=0.86), SWAT (NSE=0.81) and HEC-HMS (NSE=0.77) during calibration and GR4J (NSE=0.87) and the latter three (NSE=0.83) during validation. Lumped models were found to have comparable, albeit better in simulating low, median, and high quantiles of flows during both calibration and validation periods, compared to other models of varying complexity set for the study basin. The hydrometeorological coupling also revealed that GR4J yielded the least while HEC-HMS yielded the highest biases (up to 30-fold at some stations) in daily flow forecasting. The analysis suggested that while process-based and relatively complex models may exhibit better performance in data-rich basins, simple conceptual models like GR4J are useful for daily flow simulation and forecasting in data-constrained basins of the region.
    • Download: (2.709Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Applicability of Lumped Hydrological Models in a Data-Constrained River Basin of Asia

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4269047
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorUttam Ghimire
    contributor authorAnshul Agarwal
    contributor authorNarayan Kumar Shrestha
    contributor authorPrasad Daggupati
    contributor authorGovindarajalu Srinivasan
    contributor authorHtay Htay Than
    date accessioned2022-01-30T21:54:48Z
    date available2022-01-30T21:54:48Z
    date issued8/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
    identifier other%28ASCE%29HE.1943-5584.0001950.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4269047
    description abstractA representative of meteorological data-constrained basin, Ayeyarwady, in Myanmar, Southeast Asia, is set for flow simulation and forecasting at 15 locations using a range of hydrological modeling approaches: conceptual lumped (GR4J), hybrid-lumped [Identification of unit Hydrographs And Component flows from Rainfall Evapotranspiration and Streamflow Catchment Wetness Index (IHACRES CWI)], semidistributed [Hydrological Engineering Center-Hydrological Modeling System (HEC-HMS)], and relatively distributed [Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT)]. Using daily rainfall data from 51 surface rainfall stations (over an area of approximately 400,000  km2) and coarse monthly evaporation inputs from global sources, the models are calibrated (validated) against observed flows for 2001–2009 (2010–2014) using the performance indicators Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), percentage bias (PBIAS), RMSE-observations standard deviation ratio (RSR), and volumetric efficiency . The developed models were then integrated with rainfall forecasts from the Weather Research and Forecasting Model for 2015–2018 and assessed for biases against observed flows. The NSE values were favorable for GR4J (median NSE=0.9), followed by IHACRES (NSE=0.86), SWAT (NSE=0.81) and HEC-HMS (NSE=0.77) during calibration and GR4J (NSE=0.87) and the latter three (NSE=0.83) during validation. Lumped models were found to have comparable, albeit better in simulating low, median, and high quantiles of flows during both calibration and validation periods, compared to other models of varying complexity set for the study basin. The hydrometeorological coupling also revealed that GR4J yielded the least while HEC-HMS yielded the highest biases (up to 30-fold at some stations) in daily flow forecasting. The analysis suggested that while process-based and relatively complex models may exhibit better performance in data-rich basins, simple conceptual models like GR4J are useful for daily flow simulation and forecasting in data-constrained basins of the region.
    publisherASCE
    titleApplicability of Lumped Hydrological Models in a Data-Constrained River Basin of Asia
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume25
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001950
    page14
    treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 025 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian