YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Risk-Based Models for Optimal Sensor Location Problems in Water Networks

    Source: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 011
    Author:
    F. Hooshmand
    ,
    F. Amerehi
    ,
    S. A. MirHassani
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001293
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Water distribution networks (WDNs), as vital systems of any city, are vulnerable to the intrusion of contamination, and the security of WDNs is of great importance. A promising approach for the protection of WDNs against such threats is to deploy contaminant detection sensors in the network. One of the modeling strategies to identify an appropriate configuration of sensors is the expectation-based model. In this model, the location of sensors is determined so that the expected impact of contamination events is minimized. In this work, we consider two existing expectation-based models that have been presented in the literature. Although both models identified the same optimal sensor placements, choosing the better model in practical implementation may not be clear to practitioners, who must consider complexity and resolution times. This work first answers this question and proves that both models have the same quality—and hence, in terms of solution time, it makes no difference which model is used. As the second contribution of this work, the expectation-based model is extended to incorporate worst-case, value-at-risk (VaR), and conditional VaR (CVaR) measures. Computational results compare the damage of risk-based models with real-world WDNs, and indicate that the CVaR-based model may be an excellent approach to address risk measures in this problem. The CVaR-based model optimizes the CVaR measure and, at the same time, does not cause a significant increase in the optimal value of other risk measures.
    • Download: (873.0Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Risk-Based Models for Optimal Sensor Location Problems in Water Networks

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267930
    Collections
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorF. Hooshmand
    contributor authorF. Amerehi
    contributor authorS. A. MirHassani
    date accessioned2022-01-30T21:17:01Z
    date available2022-01-30T21:17:01Z
    date issued11/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
    identifier other%28ASCE%29WR.1943-5452.0001293.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267930
    description abstractWater distribution networks (WDNs), as vital systems of any city, are vulnerable to the intrusion of contamination, and the security of WDNs is of great importance. A promising approach for the protection of WDNs against such threats is to deploy contaminant detection sensors in the network. One of the modeling strategies to identify an appropriate configuration of sensors is the expectation-based model. In this model, the location of sensors is determined so that the expected impact of contamination events is minimized. In this work, we consider two existing expectation-based models that have been presented in the literature. Although both models identified the same optimal sensor placements, choosing the better model in practical implementation may not be clear to practitioners, who must consider complexity and resolution times. This work first answers this question and proves that both models have the same quality—and hence, in terms of solution time, it makes no difference which model is used. As the second contribution of this work, the expectation-based model is extended to incorporate worst-case, value-at-risk (VaR), and conditional VaR (CVaR) measures. Computational results compare the damage of risk-based models with real-world WDNs, and indicate that the CVaR-based model may be an excellent approach to address risk measures in this problem. The CVaR-based model optimizes the CVaR measure and, at the same time, does not cause a significant increase in the optimal value of other risk measures.
    publisherASCE
    titleRisk-Based Models for Optimal Sensor Location Problems in Water Networks
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume146
    journal issue11
    journal titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001293
    page12
    treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 011
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian