Spatial Assessment of Water-Use Vulnerability under Future Climate and Socioeconomic Scenarios within a River BasinSource: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 007Author:Heey Jin Kim
,
Kyeungwoo Cho
,
Yeonjoo Kim
,
Hyesun Park
,
Ji Wan Lee
,
Seong Joon Kim
,
Yeora Chae
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001235Publisher: ASCE
Abstract: This case study developed a framework to assess the spatial distribution of water-use vulnerability within a river basin under various scenarios of climate change, climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies. Our indicator-based approach used a multicriteria decision-making technique and drew from the vulnerability concept of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which includes components of adaptive capacity, exposure, and sensitivity. To conduct a vulnerability assessment in the Han River basin, South Korea, datasets for the selected indicators from the IPCC vulnerability concept were used in conjunction with simulation results obtained from a hydrologic model. The datasets includes the existing national statistical database, climate change scenarios from representative concentration pathways (RCPs), scenarios for climate change adaptation, and mitigation strategies from shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs). With six plausible combinations of the RCPs and SSPs, hydrological simulations using the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) were carried out. The results for the Han River basin indicate that, of the three components of vulnerability, the greatest differences between scenarios were associated with the exposure component, which is influenced by physical climate and environmental changes. Furthermore, it was shown that vulnerability can vary with different SSPs as much as it can with different RCPs. The vulnerability results obtained with the plausible SSP scenarios markedly differed from those with the historical socioeconomic data (i.e., no SSP). This shows the importance of considering socioeconomic scenarios in studies of vulnerability and sustainability in the future.
|
Show full item record
| contributor author | Heey Jin Kim | |
| contributor author | Kyeungwoo Cho | |
| contributor author | Yeonjoo Kim | |
| contributor author | Hyesun Park | |
| contributor author | Ji Wan Lee | |
| contributor author | Seong Joon Kim | |
| contributor author | Yeora Chae | |
| date accessioned | 2022-01-30T21:14:55Z | |
| date available | 2022-01-30T21:14:55Z | |
| date issued | 7/1/2020 12:00:00 AM | |
| identifier other | %28ASCE%29WR.1943-5452.0001235.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267874 | |
| description abstract | This case study developed a framework to assess the spatial distribution of water-use vulnerability within a river basin under various scenarios of climate change, climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies. Our indicator-based approach used a multicriteria decision-making technique and drew from the vulnerability concept of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which includes components of adaptive capacity, exposure, and sensitivity. To conduct a vulnerability assessment in the Han River basin, South Korea, datasets for the selected indicators from the IPCC vulnerability concept were used in conjunction with simulation results obtained from a hydrologic model. The datasets includes the existing national statistical database, climate change scenarios from representative concentration pathways (RCPs), scenarios for climate change adaptation, and mitigation strategies from shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs). With six plausible combinations of the RCPs and SSPs, hydrological simulations using the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) were carried out. The results for the Han River basin indicate that, of the three components of vulnerability, the greatest differences between scenarios were associated with the exposure component, which is influenced by physical climate and environmental changes. Furthermore, it was shown that vulnerability can vary with different SSPs as much as it can with different RCPs. The vulnerability results obtained with the plausible SSP scenarios markedly differed from those with the historical socioeconomic data (i.e., no SSP). This shows the importance of considering socioeconomic scenarios in studies of vulnerability and sustainability in the future. | |
| publisher | ASCE | |
| title | Spatial Assessment of Water-Use Vulnerability under Future Climate and Socioeconomic Scenarios within a River Basin | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 146 | |
| journal issue | 7 | |
| journal title | Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001235 | |
| page | 13 | |
| tree | Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 007 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |