YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Architectural Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Architectural Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Benchmarking Lab Wind Performance with In Situ Monitored Data of Modular Vegetated Roof Assemblies

    Source: Journal of Architectural Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 026 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    Appupillai Baskaran
    ,
    Mauricio Chavez
    ,
    Sudhakar Molleti
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000372
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: The National Research Council of Canada (NRC), as part of a consortium with members from vegetated roof industries and roofing associations, established a national wind resistance standard for modular vegetated roof assemblies (MVRAs), named CAN/CSA A123.24, “Standard Test Method for Wind Resistance of Modular Vegetated Roof Assembly.” Currently, this standard is widely used on a voluntary basis by the Canadian roofing industry for wind performance compliance of MVRAs. CAN/CSA A123.24 was developed based on extensive data collected on various MVRAs by simulating wind in laboratory conditions. Toward codification of CAN/CSA A123.24, the consortia members decided to validate such collected data with in situ performance data. This paper presents and discusses the validation process. Different MVRAs were installed on the rooftop of a Humber College building, located in Toronto. The validation was conducted by comparing the three wind performances of MVRAs as follows: (1) pressure equalization (between the top and bottom of the vegetated system); (2) coefficient of lift, CL; and (3) estimated overturning wind speed, UOT, at different wind conditions. Data comparisons (laboratory versus field) showed consistent agreement in the global trend. Some discrepancies in the absolute values were observed; however, these discrepancies are due to the inherent variability of the field wind conditions and the limited amount of field data. The forecasting of the overturning wind speed provides a valuable tool to adequately evaluate MVRA design alternatives for acceptable wind resistance compliance in accordance with the National Building Code of Canada.
    • Download: (3.429Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Benchmarking Lab Wind Performance with In Situ Monitored Data of Modular Vegetated Roof Assemblies

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4265995
    Collections
    • Journal of Architectural Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAppupillai Baskaran
    contributor authorMauricio Chavez
    contributor authorSudhakar Molleti
    date accessioned2022-01-30T19:47:48Z
    date available2022-01-30T19:47:48Z
    date issued2020
    identifier other%28ASCE%29AE.1943-5568.0000372.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4265995
    description abstractThe National Research Council of Canada (NRC), as part of a consortium with members from vegetated roof industries and roofing associations, established a national wind resistance standard for modular vegetated roof assemblies (MVRAs), named CAN/CSA A123.24, “Standard Test Method for Wind Resistance of Modular Vegetated Roof Assembly.” Currently, this standard is widely used on a voluntary basis by the Canadian roofing industry for wind performance compliance of MVRAs. CAN/CSA A123.24 was developed based on extensive data collected on various MVRAs by simulating wind in laboratory conditions. Toward codification of CAN/CSA A123.24, the consortia members decided to validate such collected data with in situ performance data. This paper presents and discusses the validation process. Different MVRAs were installed on the rooftop of a Humber College building, located in Toronto. The validation was conducted by comparing the three wind performances of MVRAs as follows: (1) pressure equalization (between the top and bottom of the vegetated system); (2) coefficient of lift, CL; and (3) estimated overturning wind speed, UOT, at different wind conditions. Data comparisons (laboratory versus field) showed consistent agreement in the global trend. Some discrepancies in the absolute values were observed; however, these discrepancies are due to the inherent variability of the field wind conditions and the limited amount of field data. The forecasting of the overturning wind speed provides a valuable tool to adequately evaluate MVRA design alternatives for acceptable wind resistance compliance in accordance with the National Building Code of Canada.
    publisherASCE
    titleBenchmarking Lab Wind Performance with In Situ Monitored Data of Modular Vegetated Roof Assemblies
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume26
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Architectural Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000372
    page04019027
    treeJournal of Architectural Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 026 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian