YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Next-Day Prediction of Tornadoes Using Convection-Allowing Models with 1-km Horizontal Grid Spacing

    Source: Weather and Forecasting:;2019:;volume 034:;issue 004::page 1117
    Author:
    Sobash, Ryan A.
    ,
    Schwartz, Craig S.
    ,
    Romine, Glen S.
    ,
    Weisman, Morris L.
    DOI: 10.1175/WAF-D-19-0044.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: AbstractExplicit attributes of convective storms within convection-allowing model (CAM) forecasts are routinely used as surrogates for convective weather hazards. The ability of 3- and 1-km horizontal grid spacing CAM forecasts to anticipate tornadoes using surrogates was examined for 497 severe weather events. Five diagnostics were used as tornado surrogates, including 0?1 km above ground level (AGL) updraft helicity (UH01), 2?5 km AGL UH (UH25), 0?3 km AGL UH (UH03), and 500 m and 1 km AGL relative vorticity. Next-day surrogate severe probability forecasts (SSPFs) for tornadoes were produced by thresholding the diagnostics and smoothing the resulting binary field. SSPFs were verified against SPC tornado reports and NWS tornado warnings. The 1-km SSPFs were more skillful than 3-km SSPFs across all diagnostics with statistically significant differences in skill that were largest on the mesoscale. UH01 outperformed the other four diagnostics, in part because UH01 best represented regional variations in observed tornado report totals. Filtering forecasts based on the significant tornado parameter benefited the 3-km SSPFs much more than the 1-km SSPFs, with filtered 3-km SSPFs having similar skill to the filtered 1-km SSPFs. SSPFs verified with a combination of tornado warnings and reports were more skillful than when verified against reports alone, indicating that CAMs can better predict intense low-level rotation events than tornadoes. When verifying all severe hazards, UH25 SSPFs were more skillful than UH01 SSPFs; UH01 and UH25 appear to be the most useful pair for anticipating tornadoes and the combined severe threat on a given forecast day.
    • Download: (1.274Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Next-Day Prediction of Tornadoes Using Convection-Allowing Models with 1-km Horizontal Grid Spacing

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4263321
    Collections
    • Weather and Forecasting

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSobash, Ryan A.
    contributor authorSchwartz, Craig S.
    contributor authorRomine, Glen S.
    contributor authorWeisman, Morris L.
    date accessioned2019-10-05T06:45:27Z
    date available2019-10-05T06:45:27Z
    date copyright6/11/2019 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2019
    identifier otherWAF-D-19-0044.1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4263321
    description abstractAbstractExplicit attributes of convective storms within convection-allowing model (CAM) forecasts are routinely used as surrogates for convective weather hazards. The ability of 3- and 1-km horizontal grid spacing CAM forecasts to anticipate tornadoes using surrogates was examined for 497 severe weather events. Five diagnostics were used as tornado surrogates, including 0?1 km above ground level (AGL) updraft helicity (UH01), 2?5 km AGL UH (UH25), 0?3 km AGL UH (UH03), and 500 m and 1 km AGL relative vorticity. Next-day surrogate severe probability forecasts (SSPFs) for tornadoes were produced by thresholding the diagnostics and smoothing the resulting binary field. SSPFs were verified against SPC tornado reports and NWS tornado warnings. The 1-km SSPFs were more skillful than 3-km SSPFs across all diagnostics with statistically significant differences in skill that were largest on the mesoscale. UH01 outperformed the other four diagnostics, in part because UH01 best represented regional variations in observed tornado report totals. Filtering forecasts based on the significant tornado parameter benefited the 3-km SSPFs much more than the 1-km SSPFs, with filtered 3-km SSPFs having similar skill to the filtered 1-km SSPFs. SSPFs verified with a combination of tornado warnings and reports were more skillful than when verified against reports alone, indicating that CAMs can better predict intense low-level rotation events than tornadoes. When verifying all severe hazards, UH25 SSPFs were more skillful than UH01 SSPFs; UH01 and UH25 appear to be the most useful pair for anticipating tornadoes and the combined severe threat on a given forecast day.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleNext-Day Prediction of Tornadoes Using Convection-Allowing Models with 1-km Horizontal Grid Spacing
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume34
    journal issue4
    journal titleWeather and Forecasting
    identifier doi10.1175/WAF-D-19-0044.1
    journal fristpage1117
    journal lastpage1135
    treeWeather and Forecasting:;2019:;volume 034:;issue 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian