YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Streamflow Drought Interpreted Using SWAT Model Simulations of Past and Future Hydrologic Scenarios: Application to Neches and Trinity River Basins, Texas

    Source: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2019:;Volume ( 024 ):;issue: 009
    Author:
    Dagbegnon Clement Sohoulande Djebou
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001827
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: In water resources and environmental management, hydrologic indexes are often valued as decision support tools because of their practical interpretability. This is true with the streamflow drought index (SDI), which is considered to be a relevant tool for assessing the availability of water resources at the watershed level. Hence, the future of freshwater resources at the watershed scale could be better understood by achieving a realistic projection of SDI. This study used a process-based watershed modeling approach to describe a framework for SDI projection. Specifically, the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model was used to simulate distinctly two watersheds located in the state of Texas, the Trinity and the Neches River Basins. The SWAT model was calibrated with monthly streamflow data for the period 1990–1995. The model was subsequently validated with two decades of discharge data (1996–2015). The evaluation of the SWAT performance during the calibration and validation stages showed acceptable values of efficiency criteria for both watersheds (i.e., Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency ranging from 0.56 to 0.65; index of agreement from 0.79 to 0.92). The calibrated model was used to simulate runoff for the future period 2041–2070 using inputs retrieved from a future climate scenario. However, the SDI calculation requires knowledge of the probability distribution of cumulative discharge data. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov’s goodness-of-fit analysis was conducted for both observed and simulated cumulative discharges. A lognormal distribution was considered for estimating time series of SDI. For the period 1996–2015, the SDI values recovered from the SWAT simulations matched closely with those derived directly from the observed discharge data (0.52≤R2≤0.91 for the Neches River, and 0.79≤R2≤0.89 for the Trinity River). This result demonstrated the capacity of the analytical procedure to capture and project realistically SDI signals. However, analysis of the χ2 statistic of the SDI patterns for the past and the future periods did not reveal any significant difference.
    • Download: (1.994Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Streamflow Drought Interpreted Using SWAT Model Simulations of Past and Future Hydrologic Scenarios: Application to Neches and Trinity River Basins, Texas

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4260538
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDagbegnon Clement Sohoulande Djebou
    date accessioned2019-09-18T10:42:29Z
    date available2019-09-18T10:42:29Z
    date issued2019
    identifier other%28ASCE%29HE.1943-5584.0001827.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4260538
    description abstractIn water resources and environmental management, hydrologic indexes are often valued as decision support tools because of their practical interpretability. This is true with the streamflow drought index (SDI), which is considered to be a relevant tool for assessing the availability of water resources at the watershed level. Hence, the future of freshwater resources at the watershed scale could be better understood by achieving a realistic projection of SDI. This study used a process-based watershed modeling approach to describe a framework for SDI projection. Specifically, the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model was used to simulate distinctly two watersheds located in the state of Texas, the Trinity and the Neches River Basins. The SWAT model was calibrated with monthly streamflow data for the period 1990–1995. The model was subsequently validated with two decades of discharge data (1996–2015). The evaluation of the SWAT performance during the calibration and validation stages showed acceptable values of efficiency criteria for both watersheds (i.e., Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency ranging from 0.56 to 0.65; index of agreement from 0.79 to 0.92). The calibrated model was used to simulate runoff for the future period 2041–2070 using inputs retrieved from a future climate scenario. However, the SDI calculation requires knowledge of the probability distribution of cumulative discharge data. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov’s goodness-of-fit analysis was conducted for both observed and simulated cumulative discharges. A lognormal distribution was considered for estimating time series of SDI. For the period 1996–2015, the SDI values recovered from the SWAT simulations matched closely with those derived directly from the observed discharge data (0.52≤R2≤0.91 for the Neches River, and 0.79≤R2≤0.89 for the Trinity River). This result demonstrated the capacity of the analytical procedure to capture and project realistically SDI signals. However, analysis of the χ2 statistic of the SDI patterns for the past and the future periods did not reveal any significant difference.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleStreamflow Drought Interpreted Using SWAT Model Simulations of Past and Future Hydrologic Scenarios: Application to Neches and Trinity River Basins, Texas
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume24
    journal issue9
    journal titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001827
    page05019024
    treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2019:;Volume ( 024 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian