YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Insights into Modeling Small-Strain Site Response Derived from Downhole Array Data

    Source: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2019:;Volume ( 145 ):;issue: 007
    Author:
    Yumeng Tao
    ,
    Ellen Rathje
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002048
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The small-strain damping ratio (Dmin) is a key parameter in site response models and using values from laboratory tests tends to overpredict the site response because laboratory tests cannot capture the wave scattering effects that are present in the field. In this study, earthquake motions from four downhole array sites are used to investigate the increase in Dmin, as quantified by the Dmin multiplier applied to the laboratory based Dmin, required to match the site response. Empirical observations from the downhole array data are compared with theoretical results from linear-viscoelastic, one-dimensional site response analysis. Different measures of ground response are considered when evaluating the site response: the acceleration transfer function (TF), the spectral acceleration amplification factor (AF), the surface motion peak ground acceleration (PGA), peak ground velocity (PGV), and Arias Intensity (Ia), and the change in the high-frequency spectral decay parameter (Δκ) between the downhole and surface sensors. It is recommended that the Dmin multiplier for a site be selected to best match the Ia rather than the TF. Across the four sites, the required Dmin multiplier varies from 1.5 to 5.5. It is hypothesized that the magnitude of the Dmin multiplier may be related to the geologic depositional environment of the site, with larger Dmin multipliers associated with more spatially variable geologic conditions. These conditions have more variation in shear wave velocity across a site, which leads to more wave scattering and larger Dmin multipliers.
    • Download: (2.028Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Insights into Modeling Small-Strain Site Response Derived from Downhole Array Data

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4260403
    Collections
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorYumeng Tao
    contributor authorEllen Rathje
    date accessioned2019-09-18T10:41:50Z
    date available2019-09-18T10:41:50Z
    date issued2019
    identifier other%28ASCE%29GT.1943-5606.0002048.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4260403
    description abstractThe small-strain damping ratio (Dmin) is a key parameter in site response models and using values from laboratory tests tends to overpredict the site response because laboratory tests cannot capture the wave scattering effects that are present in the field. In this study, earthquake motions from four downhole array sites are used to investigate the increase in Dmin, as quantified by the Dmin multiplier applied to the laboratory based Dmin, required to match the site response. Empirical observations from the downhole array data are compared with theoretical results from linear-viscoelastic, one-dimensional site response analysis. Different measures of ground response are considered when evaluating the site response: the acceleration transfer function (TF), the spectral acceleration amplification factor (AF), the surface motion peak ground acceleration (PGA), peak ground velocity (PGV), and Arias Intensity (Ia), and the change in the high-frequency spectral decay parameter (Δκ) between the downhole and surface sensors. It is recommended that the Dmin multiplier for a site be selected to best match the Ia rather than the TF. Across the four sites, the required Dmin multiplier varies from 1.5 to 5.5. It is hypothesized that the magnitude of the Dmin multiplier may be related to the geologic depositional environment of the site, with larger Dmin multipliers associated with more spatially variable geologic conditions. These conditions have more variation in shear wave velocity across a site, which leads to more wave scattering and larger Dmin multipliers.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleInsights into Modeling Small-Strain Site Response Derived from Downhole Array Data
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume145
    journal issue7
    journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002048
    page04019023
    treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2019:;Volume ( 145 ):;issue: 007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian