YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Human Adenovirus 40 Removal in Sidestream Membrane Bioreactor

    Source: Journal of Environmental Engineering:;2019:;Volume ( 145 ):;issue: 005
    Author:
    Alex L. Casabuena
    ,
    Hang Shi
    ,
    Ziqiang Yin
    ,
    Irene Xagoraraki
    ,
    Volodymyr V. Tarabara
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001525
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: This preliminary study investigates how the removal of human adenovirus in a membrane bioreactor (MBR) depends on the MBR configuration. Results from a sidestream MBR (ssMBR) are compared with data from an immersed MBR (iMBR) and literature data for another iMBR with 0.45-μm pore size hollow-fiber membranes used in all three reactors. The central premise of the study is that different fouling mitigation approaches in the ssMBR and iMBR lead to differences in membrane fouling and human adenovirus 40 (HAdV 40) removals. The hypothesis tested is that the fouling layer acts as an additional separation barrier and is largely responsible for virus removal in MBRs. Higher HAdV 40 rejection observed in the ssMBR is attributed to a higher density fouling layer formed in the ssMBR under conditions of cross-flow shear. The interpretation is supported by the measured differences in the dissolved organic carbon (DOC) removal and in the specific UV254 absorbance (SUVA254) reduction as well as in the transmembrane pressure response to periodic cleaning in the two MBRs (average decreases in HAdV 40 log removal value of 0.30 and 0.85 in ssMBR and iMBR, respectively). Although the additional energy required to create cross-flow in the ssMBR does not result in permeate flux enhancement over the iMBR baseline, the denser fouling layer in the ssMBR is a more effective barrier for viruses. This trade-off should be considered when weighing the priorities of energy savings and effluent quality.
    • Download: (699.9Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Human Adenovirus 40 Removal in Sidestream Membrane Bioreactor

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4259778
    Collections
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAlex L. Casabuena
    contributor authorHang Shi
    contributor authorZiqiang Yin
    contributor authorIrene Xagoraraki
    contributor authorVolodymyr V. Tarabara
    date accessioned2019-09-18T10:38:52Z
    date available2019-09-18T10:38:52Z
    date issued2019
    identifier other%28ASCE%29EE.1943-7870.0001525.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4259778
    description abstractThis preliminary study investigates how the removal of human adenovirus in a membrane bioreactor (MBR) depends on the MBR configuration. Results from a sidestream MBR (ssMBR) are compared with data from an immersed MBR (iMBR) and literature data for another iMBR with 0.45-μm pore size hollow-fiber membranes used in all three reactors. The central premise of the study is that different fouling mitigation approaches in the ssMBR and iMBR lead to differences in membrane fouling and human adenovirus 40 (HAdV 40) removals. The hypothesis tested is that the fouling layer acts as an additional separation barrier and is largely responsible for virus removal in MBRs. Higher HAdV 40 rejection observed in the ssMBR is attributed to a higher density fouling layer formed in the ssMBR under conditions of cross-flow shear. The interpretation is supported by the measured differences in the dissolved organic carbon (DOC) removal and in the specific UV254 absorbance (SUVA254) reduction as well as in the transmembrane pressure response to periodic cleaning in the two MBRs (average decreases in HAdV 40 log removal value of 0.30 and 0.85 in ssMBR and iMBR, respectively). Although the additional energy required to create cross-flow in the ssMBR does not result in permeate flux enhancement over the iMBR baseline, the denser fouling layer in the ssMBR is a more effective barrier for viruses. This trade-off should be considered when weighing the priorities of energy savings and effluent quality.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleHuman Adenovirus 40 Removal in Sidestream Membrane Bioreactor
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume145
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Environmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001525
    page06019004
    treeJournal of Environmental Engineering:;2019:;Volume ( 145 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian