YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Static and Rotordynamic Analysis of a Plain Annular (Liquid) Seal in the Laminar Regime With a Swirl Brake for Three Clearances

    Source: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2019:;volume( 141 ):;issue: 008::page 81002
    Author:
    Bin Najeeb, Ovais Ahmed
    ,
    Childs, Dara W.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4042650
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Tests are reported for a smooth seal with radial clearances 127 μm, 254 μm, 381 μm (1×, 2×, and 3×); length 45.72 mm, diameter 101.6 mm. An insert induced upstream preswirl. Swirl brakes (SBs), comprising 36 square cuts with axial depth 5.08 mm, radial height 6.35 mm, and circumferential width 6.35 mm each. Static and rotordynamic data were produced at ω = 2, 4, 6, 8 krpm, ΔP = 2.07, 4.14, 6.21, 8.27 bar, and eccentricity ratios ε0 = e0/Cr = 0.00, 0.27, 0.53, and 0.80. ISO VG 46 oil at a range of 46–49 °C was used, netting laminar flow (total Re ≤ 650). Dynamic measurements included components of the following vectors: (a) stator–rotor relative displacements, (b) acceleration, and (c) applied dynamic force in a stationary coordinate system. SBs were effective at the 3× clearance only. With the 3× seal, the cross-coupled stiffness coefficients have the same sign (not destabilizing). However, the seal has a negative direct stiffness K that could potentially “suck” the rotor into contact with the stator wall, along with dropping the pump rotor's natural frequency, further reducing its dynamic stability. Measurements were compared to predictions from a code by Zirkelback and San Andrés. Most predictions agree well with test data. Notable exceptions are the direct and cross-coupled stiffness coefficients for the 3× clearance. Predictions showed positive direct stiffness and opposite signs for the cross-coupled stiffness coefficients.
    • Download: (4.593Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Static and Rotordynamic Analysis of a Plain Annular (Liquid) Seal in the Laminar Regime With a Swirl Brake for Three Clearances

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4255798
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBin Najeeb, Ovais Ahmed
    contributor authorChilds, Dara W.
    date accessioned2019-03-17T09:55:48Z
    date available2019-03-17T09:55:48Z
    date copyright2/11/2019 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2019
    identifier issn0742-4795
    identifier othergtp_141_08_081002.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4255798
    description abstractTests are reported for a smooth seal with radial clearances 127 μm, 254 μm, 381 μm (1×, 2×, and 3×); length 45.72 mm, diameter 101.6 mm. An insert induced upstream preswirl. Swirl brakes (SBs), comprising 36 square cuts with axial depth 5.08 mm, radial height 6.35 mm, and circumferential width 6.35 mm each. Static and rotordynamic data were produced at ω = 2, 4, 6, 8 krpm, ΔP = 2.07, 4.14, 6.21, 8.27 bar, and eccentricity ratios ε0 = e0/Cr = 0.00, 0.27, 0.53, and 0.80. ISO VG 46 oil at a range of 46–49 °C was used, netting laminar flow (total Re ≤ 650). Dynamic measurements included components of the following vectors: (a) stator–rotor relative displacements, (b) acceleration, and (c) applied dynamic force in a stationary coordinate system. SBs were effective at the 3× clearance only. With the 3× seal, the cross-coupled stiffness coefficients have the same sign (not destabilizing). However, the seal has a negative direct stiffness K that could potentially “suck” the rotor into contact with the stator wall, along with dropping the pump rotor's natural frequency, further reducing its dynamic stability. Measurements were compared to predictions from a code by Zirkelback and San Andrés. Most predictions agree well with test data. Notable exceptions are the direct and cross-coupled stiffness coefficients for the 3× clearance. Predictions showed positive direct stiffness and opposite signs for the cross-coupled stiffness coefficients.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleStatic and Rotordynamic Analysis of a Plain Annular (Liquid) Seal in the Laminar Regime With a Swirl Brake for Three Clearances
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume141
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4042650
    journal fristpage81002
    journal lastpage081002-11
    treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2019:;volume( 141 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian