YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Risk Evaluation for Bridge Engineering Based on Cloud-Clustering Group Decision Method

    Source: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities:;2019:;Volume ( 033 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    Keke Peng
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001255
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: A combined analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method, Delphi method, and cloud model, i.e., a cloud clustering–based group decision method, is proposed. The risk probability and risk loss of the main risk factors are scored by experts. A backward cloud generator is used to calculate the digital characteristics of the sample from the experts’ scoring. A forward cloud generator is used to generate the cloud droplets according to the scoring samples from the experts. An iteration method is approved to quantify the coherence. Introduction of the expert authority, group decision risk probability, and risk loss can be obtained based on the cloud model. Similarly, the group decision weight of risk resources can also be obtained by the cloud-clustering group decision method. According to the risk resource weight, risk probability, and risk loss, risk level can be determined based on the risk judgment matrix. The study results show that the risk level of the example cable-stayed bridge is Level II, which is very similar to the computation achieved by a method derived from the current safety risk assessment guide in China. However, cloud clustering can ensure higher coherence for the samples. Consequently, the risk evaluation result will be more stable. The real bridge example and comparison analysis show that the cloud-clustering group decision method is reasonable and can objectively estimate the bridge risk.
    • Download: (1.619Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Risk Evaluation for Bridge Engineering Based on Cloud-Clustering Group Decision Method

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4254601
    Collections
    • Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities

    Show full item record

    contributor authorKeke Peng
    date accessioned2019-03-10T11:59:28Z
    date available2019-03-10T11:59:28Z
    date issued2019
    identifier other%28ASCE%29CF.1943-5509.0001255.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4254601
    description abstractA combined analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method, Delphi method, and cloud model, i.e., a cloud clustering–based group decision method, is proposed. The risk probability and risk loss of the main risk factors are scored by experts. A backward cloud generator is used to calculate the digital characteristics of the sample from the experts’ scoring. A forward cloud generator is used to generate the cloud droplets according to the scoring samples from the experts. An iteration method is approved to quantify the coherence. Introduction of the expert authority, group decision risk probability, and risk loss can be obtained based on the cloud model. Similarly, the group decision weight of risk resources can also be obtained by the cloud-clustering group decision method. According to the risk resource weight, risk probability, and risk loss, risk level can be determined based on the risk judgment matrix. The study results show that the risk level of the example cable-stayed bridge is Level II, which is very similar to the computation achieved by a method derived from the current safety risk assessment guide in China. However, cloud clustering can ensure higher coherence for the samples. Consequently, the risk evaluation result will be more stable. The real bridge example and comparison analysis show that the cloud-clustering group decision method is reasonable and can objectively estimate the bridge risk.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleRisk Evaluation for Bridge Engineering Based on Cloud-Clustering Group Decision Method
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume33
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001255
    page04018105
    treeJournal of Performance of Constructed Facilities:;2019:;Volume ( 033 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian