YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Assessment of the Effectiveness of Combat Eyewear Protection Against Blast Overpressure

    Source: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2018:;volume( 140 ):;issue: 007::page 71003
    Author:
    Sundaramurthy, A.
    ,
    Skotak, M.
    ,
    Alay, E.
    ,
    Unnikrishnan, G.
    ,
    Mao, H.
    ,
    Duan, X.
    ,
    Williams, S. T.
    ,
    Harding, T. H.
    ,
    Chandra, N.
    ,
    Reifman, J.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4039823
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: It is unclear whether combat eyewear used by U. S. Service members is protective against blast overpressures (BOPs) caused by explosive devices. Here, we investigated the mechanisms by which BOP bypasses eyewear and increases eye surface pressure. We performed experiments and developed three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) models of a head form (HF) equipped with an advanced combat helmet (ACH) and with no eyewear, spectacles, or goggles in a shock tube at three BOPs and five head orientations relative to the blast wave. Overall, we observed good agreement between experimental and computational results, with average discrepancies in impulse and peak-pressure values of less than 15% over 90 comparisons. In the absence of eyewear and depending on the head orientation, we identified three mechanisms that contributed to pressure loading on the eyes. Eyewear was most effective at 0 deg orientation, with pressure attenuation ranging from 50 (spectacles) to 80% (goggles) of the peak pressures observed in the no-eyewear configuration. Spectacles and goggles were considerably less effective when we rotated the HF in the counter-clockwise direction around the superior-inferior axis of the head. Surprisingly, at certain orientations, spectacles yielded higher maximum pressures (80%) and goggles yielded larger impulses (150%) than those observed without eyewear. The findings from this study will aid in the design of eyewear that provides better protection against BOP.
    • Download: (3.263Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Assessment of the Effectiveness of Combat Eyewear Protection Against Blast Overpressure

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4253626
    Collections
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSundaramurthy, A.
    contributor authorSkotak, M.
    contributor authorAlay, E.
    contributor authorUnnikrishnan, G.
    contributor authorMao, H.
    contributor authorDuan, X.
    contributor authorWilliams, S. T.
    contributor authorHarding, T. H.
    contributor authorChandra, N.
    contributor authorReifman, J.
    date accessioned2019-02-28T11:11:22Z
    date available2019-02-28T11:11:22Z
    date copyright4/19/2018 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2018
    identifier issn0148-0731
    identifier otherbio_140_07_071003.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4253626
    description abstractIt is unclear whether combat eyewear used by U. S. Service members is protective against blast overpressures (BOPs) caused by explosive devices. Here, we investigated the mechanisms by which BOP bypasses eyewear and increases eye surface pressure. We performed experiments and developed three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) models of a head form (HF) equipped with an advanced combat helmet (ACH) and with no eyewear, spectacles, or goggles in a shock tube at three BOPs and five head orientations relative to the blast wave. Overall, we observed good agreement between experimental and computational results, with average discrepancies in impulse and peak-pressure values of less than 15% over 90 comparisons. In the absence of eyewear and depending on the head orientation, we identified three mechanisms that contributed to pressure loading on the eyes. Eyewear was most effective at 0 deg orientation, with pressure attenuation ranging from 50 (spectacles) to 80% (goggles) of the peak pressures observed in the no-eyewear configuration. Spectacles and goggles were considerably less effective when we rotated the HF in the counter-clockwise direction around the superior-inferior axis of the head. Surprisingly, at certain orientations, spectacles yielded higher maximum pressures (80%) and goggles yielded larger impulses (150%) than those observed without eyewear. The findings from this study will aid in the design of eyewear that provides better protection against BOP.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleAssessment of the Effectiveness of Combat Eyewear Protection Against Blast Overpressure
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume140
    journal issue7
    journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4039823
    journal fristpage71003
    journal lastpage071003-12
    treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2018:;volume( 140 ):;issue: 007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian