YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • International Journal of Geomechanics
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • International Journal of Geomechanics
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Porosity and Permeability Alteration around Wellbore during Injection Process

    Source: International Journal of Geomechanics:;2018:;Volume ( 018 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    Bataee Mahmood;Irawan Sonny
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001051
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods were processed to increase the amount of oil extracted from a reservoir after primary and secondary recoveries, typically by injecting water or gas. Fluid injection has been vastly applied in oil wells as a simple and effective EOR method. Rocks are a combination of different materials that exhibit poroelastic response. The amount of stress indexed by pore pressure depends on pore content. Rock stress around a wellbore is a function of wellbore fluid flow. On the other hand, fluid flow is the function of porosity and permeability. Nevertheless, porosity and permeability alter as stress changes. Therefore, a coupling method should be used. The purpose of this study is to propose a model to find corrected stresses and calculate the change in porosity and permeability after injection. This study focuses on wellbore results. Effective parameters, such as pressure, temperature, saturation, and stress, were obtained for the multiphase flow condition using mathematical modeling. Moreover, pressure and saturation are solved using the finite-difference method, whereas the finite-volume method is applied to obtain rock stresses. The iterative coupling method is used to improve the accuracy of results. The results of the study showed how porosity and permeability will change after drilling around the well and how they will increase during injection. The results expressed the corrected distribution of stress values after injection. Porosity and permeability were reduced from their original values after drilling; nonetheless, their values had increased after injection but not equally around the wellbore. Moreover, it was concluded that the change in porosity and permeability by injection was more significant in low-porosity formations.
    • Download: (2.101Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Porosity and Permeability Alteration around Wellbore during Injection Process

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4250593
    Collections
    • International Journal of Geomechanics

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBataee Mahmood;Irawan Sonny
    date accessioned2019-02-26T07:58:10Z
    date available2019-02-26T07:58:10Z
    date issued2018
    identifier other%28ASCE%29GM.1943-5622.0001051.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4250593
    description abstractEnhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods were processed to increase the amount of oil extracted from a reservoir after primary and secondary recoveries, typically by injecting water or gas. Fluid injection has been vastly applied in oil wells as a simple and effective EOR method. Rocks are a combination of different materials that exhibit poroelastic response. The amount of stress indexed by pore pressure depends on pore content. Rock stress around a wellbore is a function of wellbore fluid flow. On the other hand, fluid flow is the function of porosity and permeability. Nevertheless, porosity and permeability alter as stress changes. Therefore, a coupling method should be used. The purpose of this study is to propose a model to find corrected stresses and calculate the change in porosity and permeability after injection. This study focuses on wellbore results. Effective parameters, such as pressure, temperature, saturation, and stress, were obtained for the multiphase flow condition using mathematical modeling. Moreover, pressure and saturation are solved using the finite-difference method, whereas the finite-volume method is applied to obtain rock stresses. The iterative coupling method is used to improve the accuracy of results. The results of the study showed how porosity and permeability will change after drilling around the well and how they will increase during injection. The results expressed the corrected distribution of stress values after injection. Porosity and permeability were reduced from their original values after drilling; nonetheless, their values had increased after injection but not equally around the wellbore. Moreover, it was concluded that the change in porosity and permeability by injection was more significant in low-porosity formations.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titlePorosity and Permeability Alteration around Wellbore during Injection Process
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume18
    journal issue2
    journal titleInternational Journal of Geomechanics
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001051
    page4017145
    treeInternational Journal of Geomechanics:;2018:;Volume ( 018 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian