YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Performance of Highway Design-Bid-Build and Design-Build Projects by Work Types

    Source: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2018:;Volume ( 144 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    Tran Dai Q.;Diraviam Guru;Minchin R. Edward
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001437
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The design-build (D-B) project delivery method has been used increasingly by state departments of transportation (DOTs) because of its documented benefits. Many studies have shown the superior performance of D-B projects when compared to traditional design-bid-build (D-B-B) projects. However, these studies often rely on experts’ judgments or small sample sizes based on data collected from surveys, interviews, or case studies. There are few, if any, empirical studies that have compared D-B-B and D-B highway project performance by work types. This research analyzed 139 pairs of D-B-B and D-B highway projects built by the Florida DOT. The 139 pairs of projects were classified into five categories of work types: (1) new construction; (2) reconstruction; (3) resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation (3R) projects; (4) intelligent transportation systems (ITS)–related projects; and (5) miscellaneous construction such as sidewalks, bike lanes, or landscaping. The study employed both parametric and nonparametric statistical tests to compare cost growth, schedule growth, and construction intensity metrics across the five project work types. The results show that D-B projects statistically perform better than D-B-B in terms of cost growth and schedule growth for miscellaneous construction and 3R project work types, respectively. Design-build projects also statistically provide a higher construction intensity (more work put in place) than D-B-B for new construction and reconstruction work types. No statistically significant differences between D-B-B and D-B projects were found for other project work types. This study contributes to the construction engineering and management body of knowledge by providing empirical comparisons between D-B-B and D-B project performance on the basis of different types of work. The findings from this paper may provide guidance for state DOTs and practitioners to select D-B project delivery for specific work types and benchmarks D-B against D-B-B.
    • Download: (498.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Performance of Highway Design-Bid-Build and Design-Build Projects by Work Types

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4250301
    Collections
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorTran Dai Q.;Diraviam Guru;Minchin R. Edward
    date accessioned2019-02-26T07:55:23Z
    date available2019-02-26T07:55:23Z
    date issued2018
    identifier other%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0001437.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4250301
    description abstractThe design-build (D-B) project delivery method has been used increasingly by state departments of transportation (DOTs) because of its documented benefits. Many studies have shown the superior performance of D-B projects when compared to traditional design-bid-build (D-B-B) projects. However, these studies often rely on experts’ judgments or small sample sizes based on data collected from surveys, interviews, or case studies. There are few, if any, empirical studies that have compared D-B-B and D-B highway project performance by work types. This research analyzed 139 pairs of D-B-B and D-B highway projects built by the Florida DOT. The 139 pairs of projects were classified into five categories of work types: (1) new construction; (2) reconstruction; (3) resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation (3R) projects; (4) intelligent transportation systems (ITS)–related projects; and (5) miscellaneous construction such as sidewalks, bike lanes, or landscaping. The study employed both parametric and nonparametric statistical tests to compare cost growth, schedule growth, and construction intensity metrics across the five project work types. The results show that D-B projects statistically perform better than D-B-B in terms of cost growth and schedule growth for miscellaneous construction and 3R project work types, respectively. Design-build projects also statistically provide a higher construction intensity (more work put in place) than D-B-B for new construction and reconstruction work types. No statistically significant differences between D-B-B and D-B projects were found for other project work types. This study contributes to the construction engineering and management body of knowledge by providing empirical comparisons between D-B-B and D-B project performance on the basis of different types of work. The findings from this paper may provide guidance for state DOTs and practitioners to select D-B project delivery for specific work types and benchmarks D-B against D-B-B.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titlePerformance of Highway Design-Bid-Build and Design-Build Projects by Work Types
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume144
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001437
    page4017112
    treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2018:;Volume ( 144 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian