YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Suspender Replacement for a Signature Bridge

    Source: Journal of Bridge Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 023 ):;issue: 011
    Author:
    Feng Dongming;Mauch Christopher;Summerville Samuel;Fernandez Omar
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001299
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The suspender is one of the most critical members for suspension bridges. Corrosion is the greatest degradation mechanism for suspenders during their service lives. Practices in North America have shown that the average time for the replacement of suspenders is between approximately 6 and 75 years. In this case study, three pairs of representative suspender ropes were removed and replaced on the Bronx–Whitestone Bridge, which was opened to traffic in 1939. The detailed suspender replacement procedure is presented. A refined three-dimensional (3D) finite-element (FE) model of the suspension bridge was developed to determine the jacking forces during replacement. To ensure that the new suspender tension reached a desirable value, an advanced vision-based sensor was adopted for noncontact force measurement, which eliminated the need for direct access to the suspender ropes to install conventional sensors. Subsequently, the existing suspenders that were removed were inspected visually. Three typical locations along suspenders, where dirt and water easily accumulate, were found to be especially vulnerable to corrosion: directly above the sockets, the section over the cable band, and at the suspender clamps. Finally, testing procedures are described to explain the estimation of the remaining ultimate strength of the removed existing ropes. The overall practices presented in this case study can help guide future suspender-rope replacements and investigations.
    • Download: (3.552Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Suspender Replacement for a Signature Bridge

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4250090
    Collections
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorFeng Dongming;Mauch Christopher;Summerville Samuel;Fernandez Omar
    date accessioned2019-02-26T07:53:26Z
    date available2019-02-26T07:53:26Z
    date issued2018
    identifier other%28ASCE%29BE.1943-5592.0001299.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4250090
    description abstractThe suspender is one of the most critical members for suspension bridges. Corrosion is the greatest degradation mechanism for suspenders during their service lives. Practices in North America have shown that the average time for the replacement of suspenders is between approximately 6 and 75 years. In this case study, three pairs of representative suspender ropes were removed and replaced on the Bronx–Whitestone Bridge, which was opened to traffic in 1939. The detailed suspender replacement procedure is presented. A refined three-dimensional (3D) finite-element (FE) model of the suspension bridge was developed to determine the jacking forces during replacement. To ensure that the new suspender tension reached a desirable value, an advanced vision-based sensor was adopted for noncontact force measurement, which eliminated the need for direct access to the suspender ropes to install conventional sensors. Subsequently, the existing suspenders that were removed were inspected visually. Three typical locations along suspenders, where dirt and water easily accumulate, were found to be especially vulnerable to corrosion: directly above the sockets, the section over the cable band, and at the suspender clamps. Finally, testing procedures are described to explain the estimation of the remaining ultimate strength of the removed existing ropes. The overall practices presented in this case study can help guide future suspender-rope replacements and investigations.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleSuspender Replacement for a Signature Bridge
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume23
    journal issue11
    journal titleJournal of Bridge Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001299
    page5018010
    treeJournal of Bridge Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 023 ):;issue: 011
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian