YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Utilization of WGEP and WDT Models by Wavelet Denoising to Predict Water Quality Parameters in Rivers

    Source: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 023 ):;issue: 012
    Author:
    Rajaee Taher;Jafari Hamideh
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001700
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: In this study, new methods based on integrating discrete wavelet transforms (DWT) into artificial neural network (ANN), gene expression programming (GEP), and decision tree (DP) approaches for several applications of water quality index estimation are proposed. The 3-year daily data used in this study, including turbidity (Tur), pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), discharge, and temperature, were measured from the Blue River at Kenneth Road, Overland Park, Kansas, in Johnson County. In addition to the time delays concerning each of the parameters DO, Tur, and pH, the temperature and discharge were considered effective in the climate of the region. The results showed that using wavelets significantly improved the performance of the ANN, DT, and GEP models, particularly in the case of extreme values. The results are comparable and suggest that wavelet-AI conjunction models could be explored as an alternative tool for water quality prediction. The performance of wavelet-gene expression programming (WGEP), which was moderately better than wavelet-artificial neural network (WANN) and wavelet-decision tree (WDT), is very promising and hence supports the use of WGEP in predicting river quality data. The results showed that the WGEP model decreased the mean absolute percentage error for the WDT, WANN, GEP, ANN, and DT models from .18, .33, .41, .47, and .35  mg/L, respectively, to .17  mg/L for the DO index, and from .26, .18, .36, .8, and .51  mg/L to .4  mg/L for the pH index, respectively. The WANN model also dropped the mean absolute percentage error for the WDT, WGEP, GEP, ANN, and DT models from 9.72, 6.68, 13.98, 8.88, and 14.81 FNU to 5.6 FNU for the Tur index. In this study, hybrid models provided more precise predictions for extremely high values.
    • Download: (2.775Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Utilization of WGEP and WDT Models by Wavelet Denoising to Predict Water Quality Parameters in Rivers

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4249740
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorRajaee Taher;Jafari Hamideh
    date accessioned2019-02-26T07:50:16Z
    date available2019-02-26T07:50:16Z
    date issued2018
    identifier other%28ASCE%29HE.1943-5584.0001700.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4249740
    description abstractIn this study, new methods based on integrating discrete wavelet transforms (DWT) into artificial neural network (ANN), gene expression programming (GEP), and decision tree (DP) approaches for several applications of water quality index estimation are proposed. The 3-year daily data used in this study, including turbidity (Tur), pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), discharge, and temperature, were measured from the Blue River at Kenneth Road, Overland Park, Kansas, in Johnson County. In addition to the time delays concerning each of the parameters DO, Tur, and pH, the temperature and discharge were considered effective in the climate of the region. The results showed that using wavelets significantly improved the performance of the ANN, DT, and GEP models, particularly in the case of extreme values. The results are comparable and suggest that wavelet-AI conjunction models could be explored as an alternative tool for water quality prediction. The performance of wavelet-gene expression programming (WGEP), which was moderately better than wavelet-artificial neural network (WANN) and wavelet-decision tree (WDT), is very promising and hence supports the use of WGEP in predicting river quality data. The results showed that the WGEP model decreased the mean absolute percentage error for the WDT, WANN, GEP, ANN, and DT models from .18, .33, .41, .47, and .35  mg/L, respectively, to .17  mg/L for the DO index, and from .26, .18, .36, .8, and .51  mg/L to .4  mg/L for the pH index, respectively. The WANN model also dropped the mean absolute percentage error for the WDT, WGEP, GEP, ANN, and DT models from 9.72, 6.68, 13.98, 8.88, and 14.81 FNU to 5.6 FNU for the Tur index. In this study, hybrid models provided more precise predictions for extremely high values.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleUtilization of WGEP and WDT Models by Wavelet Denoising to Predict Water Quality Parameters in Rivers
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume23
    journal issue12
    journal titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001700
    page4018054
    treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 023 ):;issue: 012
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian