YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Assessing Whole-Life Carbon Footprint of Under Sleeper Pad Installation for Ballasted Track

    Source: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2018:;Volume ( 144 ):;issue: 012
    Author:
    Ortega Alejandro;Blainey Simon;Preston John
    DOI: 10.1061/JTEPBS.0000192
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Increasing awareness of the problems posed by anthropogenic climate change in recent decades has led to growing concerns over the level of carbon emissions attributable to travel, transport, and infrastructure development. Although rail is a relatively low-carbon mode, there is also pressure to reduce rail’s carbon emissions to help mitigate the extent of climate change. This paper provides a lifecycle analysis study which estimates the effect on carbon emissions of installing under sleeper pads (USPs) during track renewal on two conventional railway lines in the United Kingdom. The aims and scope of the analysis, the lifecycle inventory method, units used, and lifespan of the intervention can all have an important influence on the result. Although the installation of USPs at track renewal could reduce carbon (CO2) emissions, these are very low compared with the associated financial and economic impacts, and some considerable time would be needed to generate these advantages. However, USPs might make rail travel cheaper, and the increased demand could be an important indirect effect on CO2 emissions in the transport system due to the shift from other transport modes. The use of nonrecycled rubber can offset the potential environmental benefits from the reduced requirement for track system interventions (maintenance and renewal needs), so the use of recycled carbon-neutral rubber in USP manufacturing should be incentivized.
    • Download: (634.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Assessing Whole-Life Carbon Footprint of Under Sleeper Pad Installation for Ballasted Track

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4249282
    Collections
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems

    Show full item record

    contributor authorOrtega Alejandro;Blainey Simon;Preston John
    date accessioned2019-02-26T07:46:35Z
    date available2019-02-26T07:46:35Z
    date issued2018
    identifier otherJTEPBS.0000192.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4249282
    description abstractIncreasing awareness of the problems posed by anthropogenic climate change in recent decades has led to growing concerns over the level of carbon emissions attributable to travel, transport, and infrastructure development. Although rail is a relatively low-carbon mode, there is also pressure to reduce rail’s carbon emissions to help mitigate the extent of climate change. This paper provides a lifecycle analysis study which estimates the effect on carbon emissions of installing under sleeper pads (USPs) during track renewal on two conventional railway lines in the United Kingdom. The aims and scope of the analysis, the lifecycle inventory method, units used, and lifespan of the intervention can all have an important influence on the result. Although the installation of USPs at track renewal could reduce carbon (CO2) emissions, these are very low compared with the associated financial and economic impacts, and some considerable time would be needed to generate these advantages. However, USPs might make rail travel cheaper, and the increased demand could be an important indirect effect on CO2 emissions in the transport system due to the shift from other transport modes. The use of nonrecycled rubber can offset the potential environmental benefits from the reduced requirement for track system interventions (maintenance and renewal needs), so the use of recycled carbon-neutral rubber in USP manufacturing should be incentivized.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleAssessing Whole-Life Carbon Footprint of Under Sleeper Pad Installation for Ballasted Track
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume144
    journal issue12
    journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    identifier doi10.1061/JTEPBS.0000192
    page4018073
    treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2018:;Volume ( 144 ):;issue: 012
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian