YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Quantifying Lost Labor Productivity in Domestic and International Claims

    Source: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2018:;Volume ( 010 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Zhao Tong;Dungan J. Mark
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000269
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: One of the most controversial areas in construction claims is the quantification of lost labor productivity. Although labor hours and installed quantities can be tracked, lost productivity is very difficult to track contemporaneously. Furthermore, labor productivity is susceptible to many factors, some of which are within the contractor’s control and some which are not. As a result, entitlement, causation, and credible quantification for loss of productivity claims are difficult to establish and many methods of quantification are subject to challenge with respect to validity and applicability to particular cases. This paper will review the methods to quantify lost labor productivity used in the US construction industry, along with relevant case law, and discuss the practical considerations in selecting the appropriate method for a specific case. This paper will also discuss the challenges that result from different legal and cultural backgrounds and provide caveats when quantifying lost productivity in the context of international claims.
    • Download: (119.1Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Quantifying Lost Labor Productivity in Domestic and International Claims

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4249174
    Collections
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction

    Show full item record

    contributor authorZhao Tong;Dungan J. Mark
    date accessioned2019-02-26T07:45:44Z
    date available2019-02-26T07:45:44Z
    date issued2018
    identifier other%28ASCE%29LA.1943-4170.0000269.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4249174
    description abstractOne of the most controversial areas in construction claims is the quantification of lost labor productivity. Although labor hours and installed quantities can be tracked, lost productivity is very difficult to track contemporaneously. Furthermore, labor productivity is susceptible to many factors, some of which are within the contractor’s control and some which are not. As a result, entitlement, causation, and credible quantification for loss of productivity claims are difficult to establish and many methods of quantification are subject to challenge with respect to validity and applicability to particular cases. This paper will review the methods to quantify lost labor productivity used in the US construction industry, along with relevant case law, and discuss the practical considerations in selecting the appropriate method for a specific case. This paper will also discuss the challenges that result from different legal and cultural backgrounds and provide caveats when quantifying lost productivity in the context of international claims.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleQuantifying Lost Labor Productivity in Domestic and International Claims
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume10
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000269
    page4518013
    treeJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2018:;Volume ( 010 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian