YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Using the SWAT Model in Intensively Managed Irrigated Watersheds: Model Modification and Application

    Source: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 023 ):;issue: 010
    Author:
    Wei Xiaolu;Bailey Ryan T.;Tasdighi Ali
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001696
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) is a well-established modeling tool for simulating hydrologic processes in watershed systems. However, SWAT often does not perform well in highly managed watersheds with intensive irrigation due to management practices and associated hydrologic processes (e.g., canal seepage) not included in the modeling code. This study presents a method to apply SWAT to managed irrigated watersheds, which includes (1) designating each cultivated field as a hydrologic response unit (HRU) and including recorded crop rotations; (2) applying scheduled irrigation according to water rights; and (3) simulating seepage from earthen irrigation canals, with the latter requiring a minor modification to the SWAT code. SWAT’s autoirrigation function is also used as a comparison. The methodology was applied to a 732-km2 watershed in the Lower Arkansas River Valley (southeastern Colorado), a semiarid region that has been intensively irrigated for over 1 years. The model was tested against monthly stream discharge at five stream gauging stations in the Arkansas River and its tributaries during the 21–27 period. Results demonstrate the necessity of including human management features, particularly canal seepage, to capture in-stream flows in the river and tributaries. The scheduled irrigation approach has a significantly better performance in the smaller highly agricultural tributaries whereas the autoirrigation functionality has a slightly but not significantly better performance at the outlet of the whole watershed. The methods presented herein can be applied to other semiarid irrigated regions.
    • Download: (2.739Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Using the SWAT Model in Intensively Managed Irrigated Watersheds: Model Modification and Application

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4249039
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorWei Xiaolu;Bailey Ryan T.;Tasdighi Ali
    date accessioned2019-02-26T07:44:32Z
    date available2019-02-26T07:44:32Z
    date issued2018
    identifier other%28ASCE%29HE.1943-5584.0001696.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4249039
    description abstractThe Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) is a well-established modeling tool for simulating hydrologic processes in watershed systems. However, SWAT often does not perform well in highly managed watersheds with intensive irrigation due to management practices and associated hydrologic processes (e.g., canal seepage) not included in the modeling code. This study presents a method to apply SWAT to managed irrigated watersheds, which includes (1) designating each cultivated field as a hydrologic response unit (HRU) and including recorded crop rotations; (2) applying scheduled irrigation according to water rights; and (3) simulating seepage from earthen irrigation canals, with the latter requiring a minor modification to the SWAT code. SWAT’s autoirrigation function is also used as a comparison. The methodology was applied to a 732-km2 watershed in the Lower Arkansas River Valley (southeastern Colorado), a semiarid region that has been intensively irrigated for over 1 years. The model was tested against monthly stream discharge at five stream gauging stations in the Arkansas River and its tributaries during the 21–27 period. Results demonstrate the necessity of including human management features, particularly canal seepage, to capture in-stream flows in the river and tributaries. The scheduled irrigation approach has a significantly better performance in the smaller highly agricultural tributaries whereas the autoirrigation functionality has a slightly but not significantly better performance at the outlet of the whole watershed. The methods presented herein can be applied to other semiarid irrigated regions.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleUsing the SWAT Model in Intensively Managed Irrigated Watersheds: Model Modification and Application
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume23
    journal issue10
    journal titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001696
    page4018044
    treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 023 ):;issue: 010
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian