YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Uncertainty Analysis of Flood Control Measures Including Epistemic and Aleatory Uncertainties: Probability Theory and Evidence Theory

    Source: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 023 ):;issue: 008
    Author:
    Behrouz Masoume;Alimohammadi Saeed
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001675
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Encountering uncertainty in engineering design problems is inevitable. Probability theory is a traditional method for uncertainty analysis despite the nature of uncertainties (i.e., aleatory or epistemic). Because of some limitations of probability theory in analyzing epistemic uncertainty, new methods such as evidence theory have been developed. This paper describes the analysis of uncertainty by means of both probability and evidence theories. Monte Carlo simulation is used along with the two theories to propagate the uncertainty. A computational strategy based on random sampling is used to analyze and represent the epistemic and aleatory uncertainty. Despite its advantage, the application of evidence theory in civil engineering is limited because of its mathematical complexities. This paper attempts to make this theory more applicable by using practical design problems, as well as by highlighting its advantages compared with probability theory. Three hypothetical flood-control-related problems are considered. The uncertainty of a design storm intensity resulting from an experimental equation and a design discharge resulting from the rational method are analyzed assuming storm intensity as a stochastic variable with Level 2 (i.e., both aleatory and epistemic) uncertainties. The design diameter of the pipes in a stormwater collection system is estimated. It is assumed that the input parameters have only epistemic uncertainty. The results show that if the desired risk changes, some diameters may stay fixed and some may change. The design of a flood control levee is considered. The levee height is an output variable, and it is assumed that the design discharge has Level 2 uncertainty, whereas all other inputs have epistemic uncertainty. The results of uncertainty analysis with the two theories are represented appropriately, discussed, and compared. Compared with probability theory, evidence theory offers more insight for decision makers when they encounter epistemic and/ or aleatory uncertainties in design problems.
    • Download: (4.580Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Uncertainty Analysis of Flood Control Measures Including Epistemic and Aleatory Uncertainties: Probability Theory and Evidence Theory

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4249025
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBehrouz Masoume;Alimohammadi Saeed
    date accessioned2019-02-26T07:44:23Z
    date available2019-02-26T07:44:23Z
    date issued2018
    identifier other%28ASCE%29HE.1943-5584.0001675.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4249025
    description abstractEncountering uncertainty in engineering design problems is inevitable. Probability theory is a traditional method for uncertainty analysis despite the nature of uncertainties (i.e., aleatory or epistemic). Because of some limitations of probability theory in analyzing epistemic uncertainty, new methods such as evidence theory have been developed. This paper describes the analysis of uncertainty by means of both probability and evidence theories. Monte Carlo simulation is used along with the two theories to propagate the uncertainty. A computational strategy based on random sampling is used to analyze and represent the epistemic and aleatory uncertainty. Despite its advantage, the application of evidence theory in civil engineering is limited because of its mathematical complexities. This paper attempts to make this theory more applicable by using practical design problems, as well as by highlighting its advantages compared with probability theory. Three hypothetical flood-control-related problems are considered. The uncertainty of a design storm intensity resulting from an experimental equation and a design discharge resulting from the rational method are analyzed assuming storm intensity as a stochastic variable with Level 2 (i.e., both aleatory and epistemic) uncertainties. The design diameter of the pipes in a stormwater collection system is estimated. It is assumed that the input parameters have only epistemic uncertainty. The results show that if the desired risk changes, some diameters may stay fixed and some may change. The design of a flood control levee is considered. The levee height is an output variable, and it is assumed that the design discharge has Level 2 uncertainty, whereas all other inputs have epistemic uncertainty. The results of uncertainty analysis with the two theories are represented appropriately, discussed, and compared. Compared with probability theory, evidence theory offers more insight for decision makers when they encounter epistemic and/ or aleatory uncertainties in design problems.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleUncertainty Analysis of Flood Control Measures Including Epistemic and Aleatory Uncertainties: Probability Theory and Evidence Theory
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume23
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001675
    page4018033
    treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 023 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian