YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Headed Shear Stud Fatigue Demands in Composite Bridge Girders Having Varied Stud Pitch, Girder Depth, and Span Length

    Source: Journal of Bridge Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 023 ):;issue: 011
    Author:
    Ovuoba Brianna;Prinz Gary S.
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001303
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The center-to-center spacing, or pitch, between headed shear studs in composite bridge girders is currently limited to .61 m (24 in.). However, research into shear stud performance at larger spacings has indicated that an increase in the pitch limit from .61 m (24 in.) to 1.22 m (48 in.) may be justified. As shear stud pitch increases, and as studs are grouped into clusters, the applicability of existing shear demand equations (based on continuous shear flow assumptions) may no longer be valid. This paper investigates shear demands in embedded studs of composite bridge girders through a parametric finite-element study, examining the effect of shear stud pitch, girder depth, and girder span on resulting stud demands. A total of 24 detailed finite-element models were analyzed using the commercial software ABAQUS, and four different shear stud pitches, three different girder depths, and two different span lengths were considered. Results indicated that the current AASHTO shear flow estimations do not accurately capture demands on stud clusters having center-to-center spacing greater than .61 m (24 in.). In stud clusters spaced at .91 m (36 in.) and 1.22 m (48 in.), the AASHTO shear flow prediction equation consistently underpredicted forces found in the outermost rows of each stud cluster. A new design method and updated formulation for predicting stud demands at larger spacings is presented.
    • Download: (1.619Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Headed Shear Stud Fatigue Demands in Composite Bridge Girders Having Varied Stud Pitch, Girder Depth, and Span Length

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4248447
    Collections
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorOvuoba Brianna;Prinz Gary S.
    date accessioned2019-02-26T07:38:29Z
    date available2019-02-26T07:38:29Z
    date issued2018
    identifier other%28ASCE%29BE.1943-5592.0001303.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4248447
    description abstractThe center-to-center spacing, or pitch, between headed shear studs in composite bridge girders is currently limited to .61 m (24 in.). However, research into shear stud performance at larger spacings has indicated that an increase in the pitch limit from .61 m (24 in.) to 1.22 m (48 in.) may be justified. As shear stud pitch increases, and as studs are grouped into clusters, the applicability of existing shear demand equations (based on continuous shear flow assumptions) may no longer be valid. This paper investigates shear demands in embedded studs of composite bridge girders through a parametric finite-element study, examining the effect of shear stud pitch, girder depth, and girder span on resulting stud demands. A total of 24 detailed finite-element models were analyzed using the commercial software ABAQUS, and four different shear stud pitches, three different girder depths, and two different span lengths were considered. Results indicated that the current AASHTO shear flow estimations do not accurately capture demands on stud clusters having center-to-center spacing greater than .61 m (24 in.). In stud clusters spaced at .91 m (36 in.) and 1.22 m (48 in.), the AASHTO shear flow prediction equation consistently underpredicted forces found in the outermost rows of each stud cluster. A new design method and updated formulation for predicting stud demands at larger spacings is presented.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleHeaded Shear Stud Fatigue Demands in Composite Bridge Girders Having Varied Stud Pitch, Girder Depth, and Span Length
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume23
    journal issue11
    journal titleJournal of Bridge Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001303
    page4018085
    treeJournal of Bridge Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 023 ):;issue: 011
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian