YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparison of Speed Control Bumps and Humps according to Whole-Body Vibration Exposure

    Source: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2018:;Volume ( 144 ):;issue: 009
    Author:
    Kırbaş Ufuk;Karaşahin Mustafa
    DOI: 10.1061/JTEPBS.0000177
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: One of the easiest and most efficient ways to control vehicle speeds is to create undulations perpendicular to the axis of the road. The types of undulations especially used for speed management on urban road networks are called speed control bumps (SCBs) and speed control humps (SCHs) according to their width. In general, the undulation geometry is a very important factor in changing the shock levels to which passing vehicles are exposed, and accordingly, in reducing the vehicle speeds. This study compares SCBs and SCHs with regard to human health risks using the whole-body vibration (WBV) components (VDV, Se, and R) to which vehicle drivers are exposed while passing over the undulations. Because SCBs and SCHs are usually preferred for use in urban road networks, experimental vibration measurements are conducted at 2, 3, 4, and 5  km/h vehicle speeds. In order to demonstrate the effects of different vehicle types, vibration measurements are repeated in the same driver and undulation geometries with sedan, hatchback, and station wagon vehicles for each measurement speed. The evaluations use standard evaluation methods which are frequently preferred in the world in WBV analysis. Using these methods, vehicle type and vehicle speed effects are reciprocally evaluated considering SCB and SCH geometries with equal heights. Use of the SCHs appears to be more suitable for human health in traffic speed management.
    • Download: (807.1Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Comparison of Speed Control Bumps and Humps according to Whole-Body Vibration Exposure

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4248244
    Collections
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems

    Show full item record

    contributor authorKırbaş Ufuk;Karaşahin Mustafa
    date accessioned2019-02-26T07:36:39Z
    date available2019-02-26T07:36:39Z
    date issued2018
    identifier otherJTEPBS.0000177.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4248244
    description abstractOne of the easiest and most efficient ways to control vehicle speeds is to create undulations perpendicular to the axis of the road. The types of undulations especially used for speed management on urban road networks are called speed control bumps (SCBs) and speed control humps (SCHs) according to their width. In general, the undulation geometry is a very important factor in changing the shock levels to which passing vehicles are exposed, and accordingly, in reducing the vehicle speeds. This study compares SCBs and SCHs with regard to human health risks using the whole-body vibration (WBV) components (VDV, Se, and R) to which vehicle drivers are exposed while passing over the undulations. Because SCBs and SCHs are usually preferred for use in urban road networks, experimental vibration measurements are conducted at 2, 3, 4, and 5  km/h vehicle speeds. In order to demonstrate the effects of different vehicle types, vibration measurements are repeated in the same driver and undulation geometries with sedan, hatchback, and station wagon vehicles for each measurement speed. The evaluations use standard evaluation methods which are frequently preferred in the world in WBV analysis. Using these methods, vehicle type and vehicle speed effects are reciprocally evaluated considering SCB and SCH geometries with equal heights. Use of the SCHs appears to be more suitable for human health in traffic speed management.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleComparison of Speed Control Bumps and Humps according to Whole-Body Vibration Exposure
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume144
    journal issue9
    journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    identifier doi10.1061/JTEPBS.0000177
    page4018054
    treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2018:;Volume ( 144 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian